Federal Court Rules in Favor of Professor Who Satirized School’s DEI Stance

Judges overruled a lower court decision that said the University of Washington’s actions against the plaintiff didn’t constitute viewpoint discrimination.
Federal Court Rules in Favor of Professor Who Satirized School’s DEI Stance
Students walk on campus at the University of Washington in Seattle on March 6, 2020. Karen Ducey/Getty Images
|Updated:
0:00

University of Washington professor Stuart Reges was exercising free speech when he parodied his employer’s official statement that the land encompassing the Seattle school belongs to local indigenous people, federal judges have determined.

The U.S. Ninth Circuit ruled in a 2–1 decision Dec. 19 that the university violated Reges’ First Amendment Rights when they punished him for including on his course syllabus a satirical take on the school’s official land acknowledgement statement.

Aaron Gifford
Aaron Gifford
Author
Aaron Gifford has written for several daily newspapers, magazines, and specialty publications and also served as a federal background investigator and Medicare fraud analyst. He graduated from the University at Buffalo and is based in Upstate New York.