California’s ‘One Gun a Month’ Law is Unconstitutional, Court Affirms

The state argued that the Second Amendment guarantees only a right to possess a single firearm. ‘California is wrong,’ the appeals court judge said.
California’s ‘One Gun a Month’ Law is Unconstitutional, Court Affirms
Shoppers browse among firearms and accessories at the Crossroads of the West Gun Show at the Convention Center in Ontario, Calif., on Jan. 28, 2023. Apu Gomes/AFP via Getty Images
|Updated:
0:00
California’s “one-gun-a-month” law violates the Second Amendment, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled June 20, affirming a lower court’s decision.
“The panel held that California’s law is facially unconstitutional because the plain text of the Second Amendment protects the possession of multiple firearms and protects against meaningful constraints on the acquisition of firearms through purchase,” wrote Circuit Judge Danielle Forrest in the opinion.
Jill McLaughlin
Jill McLaughlin
Author
Jill McLaughlin is an award-winning journalist covering politics, environment, and statewide issues. She has been a reporter and editor for newspapers in Oregon, Nevada, and New Mexico. Jill was born in Yosemite National Park and enjoys the majestic outdoors, traveling, golfing, and hiking.