Concern about Taiwan is growing. The tiny nation of around 23 million people has been a democratic success story, showing, to the shame of the giant nation on the mainland, that they can indeed govern themselves.
And while governing themselves, the Taiwanese have stood firm, facing down the giant military of the People’s Republic of China that has regularly threatened invasion.
But now, observers agree, the danger to Taiwan may now come less in the form of brute force, and more by turning the nation’s ballot box against itself, as subversion by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) threatens to change the character of Taiwan and undo its proud legacy of freedom.
In a speech commemorating the 40th anniversary of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen said that Taiwan is faced with “unprecedented challenge,” and called for a U.S. commitment based on “shared values.”
Addressing a full house at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington via video footage on April 9, Tsai said, “Because of the Taiwan Relations Act, the U.S. has played a crucial role to help [Taiwan] reject coercion.”
Tsai praised the Taiwan Relations Act for helping Taiwan go through the darkest time in their history, and is proud of the fact that Taiwan has become one of the freest countries in the world.
“In terms of security, [the act] laid out a framework to not only ‘provide Taiwan with arms of a defensive character’ but also ‘to consider any effort to determine the future of Taiwan by other than peaceful means, including by boycotts or embargoes, a threat to the peace and security of the Western Pacific area and of grave concern to the United States,” she said.
When asked about one wish she wanted to make, Tsai said it would be for the young generations in Taiwan to know democracy as the only way of living.
However, this way of life “is under unprecedented challenge. Using economic incentives, control over sources of information, and political subversion, China’s objective is to divide our society, erode trust in public institutions, and make people question our traditional alliances. The U.S., together with other like-minded countries, can help.”
Tsai hopes the United States can express to China at a very “senior” level that “it considers the security of Taiwan vital to the defense of democracy, both here and around the world. And similarly, it considers any threat to Taiwan’s freedom, democracy, and our way of life, of critical concern to the United States.”
Tsai also used the opportunity to push her agenda for a bilateral free trade agreement with the United States, “an agreement that is based on our values and ideas.”
“Today, Taiwan, a country of 23 million people, is United States’ 11th-largest trading partner,” she said. “It’s a complementary relationship, not a competitive one.”
Tsai said that she “could not agree more” with U.S. President Donald Trump’s view that “economic security is national security.” She believes Taiwan is “part of that,” as Taiwan has the capacity to expand its economic relationship with the United States.
Tsai said that Taiwan and the United States have the potential to work together in “crafting an agreement that can become the model for the rest of Indo-Pacific region.”
“China’s influence campaigns are primarily undertaken using economic apparatus. By relying on ourselves, with the United States and other free-market countries, we can reduce our economic reliance on China, and their capacity to interfere in our media, politics, and security.”
Tsai said that “Taiwan is a crucial link in the global high-tech supply chain, which the U.S. and other like-minded countries are looking at more closely in terms of its integrity, and data security.”
Tsai said this is particularly relevant in the case of Huawei, and the battle over the control of the 5G networks.
“We need to shape the flow of the supply chain, so that critical technologies, infrastructures, and assets do not fall into the wrong hands,” she said.
Tsai praised the Trump administration for having shown that “it has the capacity to be creative when it comes to trade,” and hopes that “they can apply the same principle when it comes to discussion with Taiwan.”
Tsai said that Taiwan is committed to defending itself from China’s military threat, and has made more investment in defense.
Referring to Trump’s approval of $1.4 billion in arms sales in 2017 that included advanced missiles and torpedoes, followed by a second arms package worth $330 million in 2018, she said, “Cooperation between our two countries has continued to fulfill the spirit of these articles. Already, a steady drumbeat of arms sales have been announced by the current U.S. administration, and we have more in the pipeline.”
Tsai ended her speech by again stressing the “shared values” of the United States and Taiwan.
“At this critical moment, it is more important than ever to ensure that the letter and the spirit of the TRA prevail, and that the values we share continue to shape the future of our region,” she said.
“Our shared vision has made two countries even closer than ever before. And together, with your support, we will continue to remind the world that Taiwan is an irreplaceable force for good in the world.”
Hybrid Warfare Tactics
While Tsai sounded more optimistic and hopeful toward what is in store for Taiwan, China experts and observers are more concerned.
“Here in Taiwan, it’s China that dominates every discussion. Beijing’s malign influence is apparent everywhere, while the United States is seen as largely absent. Washington must wake up to the danger of China’s massive effort to infiltrate, undermine and eventually abolish Taiwan’s democracy,” Josh Rogin, a columnist for The Washington Post wrote in an opinion article.
Rogin wrote, “Following its successful interference effort in last November’s local elections, Beijing is now focused intensely on ousting Tsai and her Democratic People’s Party in next January’s presidential contest.”
He said that “a Chinese military invasion is no longer the scenario Taiwanese fear most. China’s strategy to take over Taiwan is focused now on the hybrid warfare tactics authoritarian regimes increasingly deploy in free societies.”
Frank Tian Xie, a business professor at the University of South Carolina–Aiken, agrees that, although military threat is one of the major challenges for Taiwan, the most dangerous challenge is the CCP’s infiltration.
Xie thinks the possibility of the CCP waging a war against Taiwan is low, as a war could trigger fiercer internal struggles in the CCP and objections from the Chinese public, as well as the United States’ military intervention.
By influencing elections, deploying spies, and buying out the media and elites in the political and business communities, Xie said, the CCP has raised its interference to a dangerous level. The media and compromised elites have become representatives of the CCP.
Xie said that even some Taiwanese-founded Chinese-language newspapers in the United States have now become mouthpieces for the CCP, such as the World Journal and The China Press.
Xie said Taiwan should adopt a law similar to the United States’ “Foreign Agents Registration Act,” and require those media that actually represent the CCP to register as foreign agents so the Taiwanese public would not be misled by these outlets’ fake news that harms Taiwan.
The third threat Taiwan is facing, Xie said, is its economic dependence on China. In 2017, Xie was invited to National Taiwan University to conduct research on the trade relationships and interdependence between Taiwan and China.
After analyzing economic and trade figures for the past 20 years, Xie and his co-researcher found that Taiwan’s economic dependence on China was 10 times China’s dependence on Taiwan.
Xie said this was an alarming figure, and Taiwan should realize the grave danger.
He said a bilateral free trade agreement between the United States and Taiwan is a very good initiative. Given the Trump administration’s strong support for Taiwan, Xie said the opportunity is ripe for Taiwan to start direct talks with the United States.
Chinese political and economic analyst Qin Peng told The Epoch Times that a bilateral free trade agreement between the United States and Taiwan would not only enhance U.S. national security and offer Taiwan more protection by reducing Taiwan’s dependence on China, but also will benefit China by encouraging healthy development there.
Qin said, as part of the global high-tech supply chain, Taiwan plays a critical role in global information security, including the security of the United States and the Indo-Pacific region.
If a free trade agreement can be achieved, given that the United States has started to restrict the transfer of high-tech to China, more Taiwanese high-tech companies would choose to move back to Taiwan. This can in turn prevent the CCP’s forced technology transfer, theft, and potential compromise of critical parts of the supply chain.
Qin said a free and safe Taiwan is the beacon for many mainland Chinese who long for democracy. Taiwan’s development and safety can give Chinese people hope and more incentive to strive for freedom and democracy, and to contain the CCP’s predatory expansion.
Tang Baiqiao, former 1989 Tiananmen Square-uprising student leader and president of Democracy Academy of China, said a free trade agreement would bring U.S.–Taiwan relations to another height, and make the United States feel more secure about Taiwan’s attitude. If Taiwan becomes too close with the CCP, there is little the United States can to do intervene, even when the CCP tries to suffocate free institutions in Taiwan.
Tang said a trade agreement with the United States can also set an example for other countries, encouraging them to improve trade relations with Taiwan, and he hopes that Taiwan can seize the opportunity.
Support Chinese Democracy
Cao Ji (alias on Twitter), a former professor at a university in Shanghai who now lives in Taiwan, said that whether or not the status quo between Taiwan and China can be maintained depends on China’s economic status in the coming years.
If China’s current financial stimulus policy cannot save China’s economy, the CCP could use “Taiwan independence” as an excuse to create and intensify tensions at the Taiwan Strait to distract attention from its own crisis. Both Taiwan and the United States should prepare for this possibility in advance, he said.
Cao said, faced with the CCP’s aggressive pressure on all fronts, Taiwan should cooperate more with the United States in politics, the economy, diplomacy, and the military.
At the same time, the Taiwanese government should be more proactive in supporting the Chinese people’s fight against the CCP’s tyranny, as well as their struggle to gain freedom and democracy.
Taiwan should be more involved in international human rights and the activities by NGOs to expose the CCP’s atrocities.
Cao said that Taiwan is an important base for the semiconductor industry, and has the responsibility to ensure that sensitive technology will not fall into the CCP’s hands. Taiwan and the United States should cooperate in law enforcement to punish Taiwanese businesses and individuals who secretly transfer U.S. technology and patents to the CCP, to prevent further damage.
He Qinglian, a China scholar, wrote in a commentary in Chinese that among the new “Romance of Three Kingdoms” of the United States, China, and Taiwan, the U.S. attitude is an important force to balance the relationship across the Taiwan Strait.
However, the main “function” of the TRA is to ensure that the United States will ensure Taiwan’s safety if, and only if, the CCP tries to “unify” Taiwan with force. The TRA cannot and will not protect Taiwan from CCP’s “peaceful” infiltration.
That is why the United States has never tried to intervene with Taiwan’s affairs, even when Taiwan was about to pass the Cross-Strait Service Trade Agreement, which was thought to be a building block for “peaceful unification.”
In this sense, He argued, the TRA does not have the function of protecting Taiwan’s democracy, as many Taiwanese have wished.
Therefore, the greatest challenge for people in Taiwan, who have somehow taken free elections for granted, is how to select the next president in 2020, who can fight against the CCP’s red influence, and develop Taiwan’s economy at the same time, while finding the fine line to balance its relationships with the two superpowers: the United States and China.
Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.