The Red Flags With Canada’s Green Bonds

Ottawa’s first green bond, to mobilize private sector investment for Canada’s transition to net-zero by 2050, has a climate finance expert questioning how such financing will serve the country’s needs without raising red flags.
The Red Flags With Canada’s Green Bonds
A farmer walks past solar panel and wind energy projects close to his farm near Vulcan, Alta., in a file photo. (The Canadian Press/Larry MacDougal)
Rahul Vaidyanath
3/30/2022
Updated:
3/30/2022
News Analysis

Ottawa’s first green bond, to mobilize private sector investment for Canada’s transition to net-zero by 2050, has a climate finance expert questioning how such financing will serve the country’s needs without raising red flags.

The feds say the $5 billion, 7.5-year bond’s proceeds will finance investments in “green infrastructure and other projects that will help fight climate change and protect the environment.”

But Ross McKitrick, a University of Guelph professor specializing in environmental economics, says the taxpayer is bearing the risk instead of the private sector bond investor.

“If the government feels obliged to issue these bonds to fund targeted investments rather than leaving it to the private sector, then they must think either the investments have worse rates of return or have higher default risks,” McKitrick told The Epoch Times. 

“The government is trying to claim both that the target investments are great opportunities, but also that the private sector doesn’t want them, so the government has to step in. This is obviously a contradiction.”

Canada’s inaugural $5 billion green bond had received over $11 billion in orders by March 22, with a majority of the buyers (72 percent) being “environmentally and socially responsible investors,” as described by the feds, and with 45 percent being international investors.

“Tapping into private sector capital requires a strong sustainable finance landscape where transparency and clear standards are guiding tenets,” states the feds’ green bond framework.

But McKitrick points out that Canada’s green bond investors aren’t actually taking any risk to finance the green transition.

“The [green] bond purchasers want to be able to signal to various stakeholders that they have put money into ‘green' investments even though they are really just buying risk-free fixed-income government securities,” McKitrick said.

“The ultimate cost to the taxpayers will emerge when we see what the funds are invested in and whether they generate any positive returns.” 

McKitrick also notes, however, that there’s a risk of not having enough green projects to invest in that meet the criteria.

“The government may end up sitting on the cash for a long time, or they might find ways of redefining what a ‘green’ investment is, the way Europe now classes nuclear and natural gas as green energy for the purpose of regulatory compliance,” he said. 

Ottawa’s criteria for its green bond investments rule out investments in nuclear power while including other forms of renewable energy, and also exclude investments in fossil fuel exploration and production—even though those are critical sectors of the Canadian economy.

Late to the Party

Green bond investment criteria have largely been determined by other countries and their investors, as the feds are relatively late in issuing such a bond. Ontario issued Canada’s first green bond in 2014, six years after the World Bank issued the first-ever green bond.

The Globe and Mail cites OECD data noting that 19 countries had already issued green bonds as of mid-2021, and that Canada saw green bond sales of US$14 billion in 2021, based on Refinitiv data.

According to the feds, “activities selected for inclusion under Canada’s green bond framework are based on best international practices followed by other sovereign green bond issuers in the G7.”

The framework sets out eligibility criteria based on the International Capital Markets Association’s green bond principles in nine areas, including clean transportation, climate change adaptation, energy efficiency, and pollution prevention and control.

The Globe and Mail reported that the feds said the proceeds from their green bond sales cannot be used for initiatives to lower oil and gas company emissions, since the exclusions to green bond investments stem from “exclusionary criteria embedded in major green bond indices” and “market expectations.”

This is despite Ottawa acknowledging that some of the biggest contributions to reducing emissions come from oil and gas companies. “Rapidly reducing methane emissions from the oil and gas sector is one of the fastest, most cost-effective things we can do to fight climate change,” it said in a March 25 press release, 

Ben Brunnen, VP of oil sands, fiscal, and economic policy at the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) told The Epoch Times that “the oil and natural gas sector is by far Canada’s largest spender on clean technology—accounting for 75 percent of the total annual spending by all sectors.”

But since Canada’s green bond funding can’t go to oil and gas companies, the feds are separately spending money to fight emissions in that sector via a $750 million Emissions Reduction Fund, launched in October 2020. This amount, however, pales in comparison to the $9.1 billion in new funding announced by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on March 29 as part of the feds’ 2030 emissions reduction plan.

Along with the government directing funding and private investment toward green initiatives and less money flowing into the energy sector, Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson said on March 24 that Canada can produce and export another 300,000 barrels of oil and natural gas per day to support a global effort to displace Russian energy in Europe.

The CAPP said this additional capacity would come from 2023–24 capital and operations planning and would be transported through the United States.

“To ensure more Canadian natural gas and oil can make it to market in the short and medium term, the industry needs strong signals from the federal government [that] it will support Canada’s global role, including by supporting the advancement of key energy and infrastructure projects in Canada,” Brunnen said.

Taxpayers on the Hook

The 2019 green bonds fact sheet for investors issued by the Toronto-based Responsible Investment Association says that “the success of the green bond market will ultimately depend on the ability of issuers to assure investors that the proceeds will be used for projects that are truly green.”

According to Canada’s green bond framework, “The Paris Agreement is expected to require over $100 trillion in global investment over the next decade, with more than $2 trillion invested in Canada.”

The International Monetary Fund says the amount of debt issued that’s linked to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors more than tripled in 2021 to US$190 billion.

Thus the feds say the green bond program is just getting started, with more issuances being planned to develop the sustainable finance market in Canada.

Interest rates have risen significantly in the last few weeks as central banks fight inflation, which makes the cost of a significant new borrowing program far more expensive.

Rahul Vaidyanath is a journalist with The Epoch Times in Ottawa. His areas of expertise include the economy, financial markets, China, and national defence and security. He has worked for the Bank of Canada, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp., and investment banks in Toronto, New York, and Los Angeles.
twitter
Related Topics