Relaxed Response to Coronavirus Befits State of Canada’s Health Care

Health Minister Patty Hajdu looks on as Foreign Affairs Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne responds to a question about the coronavirus during a joint press conference in Ottawa on Jan. 29, 2020. (The Canadian Press/Adrian Wyld)

Commentary

Coronaviruses are not new and rarely cause problems. But they can be deadly.

The United States declared the novel coronavirus a public health emergency on Jan. 31 and has temporarily banned foreign nationals from entering the country if they’ve been in China within the previous 14 days. Philippines, Australia, and Vietnam have adopted a similar policy, with several other countries introducing various kinds of travel restrictions.

U.S. airlines Delta, United, and American have cancelled all flights to mainland China with various start and end dates between now and the end of April. Air Canada has cancelled all flights to Beijing and Shanghai until the end of February. Businesses do not make decisions that cost this much without solid evidence to justify the expense.

Major airports in New York City, San Francisco, and Los Angeles have implemented screening for all passengers from China. Passengers arriving on the last Air Canada flights from Beijing and Shanghai on Jan. 30 were asked a few questions at Toronto’s Pearson Airport and handed a coronavirus fact sheet if they were cleared. Those who screened positive or reported symptoms of infection were referred to public health staff. But one passenger told CityNews she was surprised at the relaxed approach, given the opposite experience in Shanghai.

Canada has not imposed restrictions on travellers from China and has not declared a national emergency. Federal Health Minister Patty Hajdu has stated that the risk remains low.

In mainland China, the number of people infected is in the thousands, but fortunately there are not that many cases outside China so far, with just a handful in Canada and the United States. To add perspective, in Canada, approximately 3,500 patients die annually from Influenza A and B—otherwise known as the flu. However, the flu rarely kills patients in their fifties, while the coronavirus does kill patients in this age group.

The Lancet, a leading international medical journal, published a forecasting model on Jan. 31, the same day that the World Health Organization declared the coronavirus a global emergency. The authors suggested that:

“Large cities overseas with close transport links to China could also become outbreak epicentres, unless substantial public health interventions at both the population and personal levels are implemented immediately. Independent self-sustaining outbreaks in major cities globally could become inevitable because of substantial exportation of pre-symptomatic cases and in the absence of large-scale public health interventions.”

Health-care workers agonize to avoid irrational panic, but the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) looks worrisome.

Coronaviruses became famous in 2002 with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV). Most of us in the medical community remember working through the SARS outbreak of 2002–2003. Worldwide, only 744 people died from SARS, but it shut down health care in Canada. I remember patients presenting to the emergency department days after their heart attack—long after any chance to open blocked arteries or rescue heart muscle. They were too scared to come to the emergency department during the SARS outbreak, but eventually, chest pain, weakness, and shortness of breath from a damaged heart forced them to seek medical care.

All the people who avoided acute care during the outbreak never made it into the statistics about SARS itself. Death certificates would not list SARS as a cause of death for someone who died of a heart attack because they were too scared to go to the hospital during the outbreak.

False Alarm or Rational Concern?

All the news about 2019-nCoV comes a week after Brampton city council on Jan. 22 unanimously declared a state of emergency due to hospital overcrowding. All the beds at Brampton Civic Hospital are full. Patients are dying in hallways. The hospital is at over 100 percent capacity. All across Ontario, standard operating procedure is to over-fill hospitals by placing patients in “hallways, lunch rooms, and auditoriums every day,” according to research by CBC News. It seems that new national emergencies make old ones irrelevant.

Alarms save lives. And even false alarms force us to see whether we are ready. The Spanish flu—an influenza pandemic, not itself a coronavirus—infected one-third of the world’s population in 1918, killing 20–50 million people. Experts say there’s no reason to doubt it could happen again. We just do not know when.

Coronavirus strains that infect humans have been known since the 1960s. The most lethal one currently is the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, or MERS-CoV. It kills three to four out of every ten people infected. But most strains that infect humans do not cause serious problems. We don’t know how the 2019 coronavirus will develop. Will it be worse than SARS?

If the new coronavirus fizzles out, Canada will bolster its reputation as a calm and rational country. Only hindsight will determine the wisdom of our actions. However, if the coronavirus sends hundreds of people to hospital, we already know that we do not have anywhere to put them. That, in itself, seems a reasonable cause for alarm. But that would be un-Canadian.

Shawn Whatley is a physician, past president of the Ontario Medical Association, a blogger at ShawnWhatley.com, and a Munk Senior Fellow with the Macdonald-Laurier Institute. He is the author of “No More Lethal Waits,” a guide to reducing wait times and increasing efficiency in hospital emergency departments.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.