Viewpoints
Opinion

Why Airstrikes Alone Cannot Stop Tehran’s Drive for the Bomb

Why Airstrikes Alone Cannot Stop Tehran’s Drive for the Bomb
A satellite image shows black smoke rising and heavy damage at Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's compound, following strikes by the United States and Israel, in Tehran, Iran, on Feb. 28, 2026. (Pleiades Neo (c) Airbus DS 2026/Handout via Reuters)
|Updated:
0:00
Commentary
In the heated debates over the status of Iran’s nuclear weapons program, some pundits try to make the case that even if Iran does get the bomb, “because we’ve learned to coexist with North Korea’s nuclear arsenal, we could do the same with Iran.” After all, both are rogue regimes, spewing bellicose rhetoric and defying international norms by pursuing weapons of mass destruction amid sanctions and isolation. But by digging just a little, we see this is an apples-to-oranges comparison. North Korea, under Kim Jong Un, is a survivalist dictatorship focused on self-preservation, with no grand ideology to export, unless you count “life is miserable, then you cease to exist” as being a viable export. In sharp contrast, the Khomeinist regime is controlled by those promoting a transcendental “martyrdom culture” that incentivizes risk by promising eternal rewards. This makes Iran’s expansionist Islamic supremacism far more contagious and harder to deter than North Korea’s secular dreariness and abject poverty.
Mike Fredenburg
Mike Fredenburg
Author
Mike Fredenburg writes on military technology and defense matters with an emphasis on defense reform. He holds a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering and master’s degree in production operations management.