Viewpoints
Opinion

Defending the Constitution: Why the Framers Thought Ratification by Only 9 States Was Sufficient

Defending the Constitution: Why the Framers Thought Ratification by Only 9 States Was Sufficient
Festa/Shutterstock
|Updated:
0:00
Commentary
In an earlier essay in my “Defending the Constitution” series, I responded to the common charge that the 1787 Constitutional Convention abused its trust. The charge is that the commissioners (delegates) exceeded the scope of the convention “call” issued by Congress. In response, I pointed out that Congress didn’t call the Constitutional Convention; Virginia did. And the scope of the commissioners’ power wasn’t defined by Congress but by the states, which granted them sufficient authority to recommend a new Constitution.
Rob Natelson
Rob Natelson
Author
Robert G. Natelson, a former constitutional law professor who is senior fellow in constitutional jurisprudence at the Independence Institute in Denver, authored “The Original Constitution: What It Actually Said and Meant” (3rd ed., 2015). He is a contributor to The Heritage Foundation’s “Heritage Guide to the Constitution.”
Related Topics