Barbara Kay: Anthropology Associations’ Pivot to Social-Justice Model of Academic Inquiry Is Anti-Science

Barbara Kay: Anthropology Associations’ Pivot to Social-Justice Model of Academic Inquiry Is Anti-Science
The discussion, titled “Let’s Talk about Sex, Baby: Why Biological Sex Remains a Necessary Analytic Category in Anthropology,” was accepted in July for AAA/CASCA’s conference without demur, but then rejected “at the request of numerous members." Xolodan/Shutterstock
Barbara Kay
Updated:
0:00
Commentary

Anthropology was once a noble academic discipline, dedicated to the scientific exploration of human societies in all their ethnic, linguistic, institutional, and cultural diversity. The anthropologist’s role was to study people whose social relationships—both to each other and to outsiders—are grounded in customs and values unfamiliar to us. Study, not judge. Indeed, Canada’s fervent embrace of multiculturalism was a policy outcome of that academic model.

Barbara Kay
Barbara Kay
Author
Barbara Kay is a columnist and author. Her latest writing project is co-authorship with Linda Blade of the book “Unsporting: How Trans Activism and Science Denial are Destroying Sport.”
Related Topics