Viewpoints
Opinion

Explaining the Texas Presidential Election Case: Where the Supreme Court Was Right and Wrong

Explaining the Texas Presidential Election Case: Where the Supreme Court Was Right and Wrong
The U.S. Supreme Court is seen in Washington, D.C. on May 27, 2014. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
|Updated:
Commentary

On Dec. 7, Texas sued Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia, claiming that the way those states conducted their presidential elections violated Texans’ constitutional rights.

Rob Natelson
Rob Natelson
Author
Robert G. Natelson, a former constitutional law professor who is senior fellow in constitutional jurisprudence at the Independence Institute in Denver, authored “The Original Constitution: What It Actually Said and Meant” (3rd ed., 2015). He is a contributor to The Heritage Foundation’s “Heritage Guide to the Constitution.”
Related Topics