DOJ: Wells Fargo Agrees to Pay $2.09 Billion Penalty for Role in Financial Crisis

DOJ: Wells Fargo Agrees to Pay $2.09 Billion Penalty for Role in Financial Crisis
A Wells Fargo bank sign is pictured in downtown Los Angeles, California Aug. 10, 2017. (REUTERS/Mike Blake/File Photo)
Bowen Xiao
8/1/2018
Updated:
8/1/2018
The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced on Aug. 1. that Wells Fargo agreed to pay a civil penalty of $2.09 billion for their role in misrepresenting mortgage loans, which ultimately contributed to the 2008 financial crisis.

Company executives were well aware their residential mortgage loans contained “misstated income information” which led to investors suffering from billions of dollars in losses from investing in residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS).

“This settlement holds Wells Fargo accountable for actions that contributed to the financial crisis,” Acting Associate Attorney General Jesse Panuccio said in a statement. “It sends a strong message that the Department is committed to protecting the nation’s economy and financial markets against fraud.”

Between the periods of 2005 to 2007, Wells Fargo sold at least 73,539 stated income loans that were included in RMBS. About half of the loans ended up defaulted, resulting in major losses to investors, according to the DOJ.

Tim Sloan, the CEO of Wells Fargo, said he was content the company could finally move on. According to a July 13 report, the bank earned a net income of $5.2 billion in this year’s second quarter.
“We are pleased to put behind us these legacy issues regarding claims related to residential mortgage-backed securities activities that occurred more than a decade ago,” Sloan said in a statement. “Wells Fargo remains focused on our important role as one of the nation’s leading providers of mortgage financing and on our commitment to expanding sustainable homeownership opportunities for our customers.”

On June 30, the amount of the settlement was fully accrued, according to the bank.

In the bank’s own testing, they found more than 70 percent of its loans had an “unacceptable variance” between what the borrower’s income could afford and how much they had to pay. After further testing, they found that “nearly half” of the stated income loans had both an unacceptable variance and no “plausible explanation” for why.

In 2014, the Bank Of America agreed to pay an even higher amount, a $5 billion penalty, as part of a $16.65 billion settlement.
Bowen Xiao was a New York-based reporter at The Epoch Times. He covers national security, human trafficking and U.S. politics.
twitter