Democratic Presidential Candidates Criticize DNC Over Debate Thresholds: ‘Turned This Primary Into the Hunger Games’

L: Tom Steyer, a Democratic presidential candidate, talks with fairgoers while walking around the Iowa State Fair on Aug. 11, 2019. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) R: Democratic presidential candidate Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) speaks at the Iowa State Fair in Des Moines, Iowa on Aug. 9, 2019. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Democratic presidential candidates who appear to have missed qualifying for the next round of debates are striking out at the Democratic National Committee (DNC), accusing the group—which underwent turmoil when a leak showed it favored Hillary Clinton over Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in 2016—of unfairly winnowing the field as the campaign intensifies less than six months before the first primary.

Ten contenders have qualified for the debates, half the number that was allowed onstage in late July. The deadline to qualify is Aug. 28.

“These DNC debate rules have turned this primary into the ‘The Hunger Games,’” Montana Gov. Steve Bullock said on CNN. “Each step of this seems to be all about getting donors. I’ve made 10 trips to Iowa, I’ve been to New Hampshire a couple of times—I’m actually talking to voters, not just chasing $1 donors.”

Candidates needed donations from 130,000 donors and at least 2 percent support in four different polls, with only certain polling organizations and national polls or surveys in early primary states allowed.

The campaign of Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii), who was on active duty during the past two weeks, took aim at the polling requirement. Gabbard’s campaign said she received support of 2 percent or more in 26 national and early state polls, but only two were counted.

2020 Democratic candidate and Montana Gov. Steve Bullock speaks at the Iowa Federation Labor Convention in Altoona, Iowa, on Aug. 21, 2019. (Photo by Joshua Lott/Getty Images)

“The Gabbard campaign is calling on the DNC to hold true to their promise and make adjustments to the process now to ensure transparency and fairness. Crucial decisions on debate qualifications that impact the right of the American people to have the opportunity to participate fully in the Democratic process should not be made in secret by party bosses,” the campaign said in a statement on Friday, adding that the committee should “revise their list of debate qualifying polls in light of numerous irregularities in the selection and timing of those polls, to ensure transparency and fairness.”

One of the polls that Gabbard scored enough in—at 3 percent—was the only live telephone poll conducted in New Hampshire, which holds the first primary in the nation. The survey, from The Boston Globe and Suffolk University, isn’t counted by the DNC.

“Many of the uncertified polls, including those conducted by highly reputable organizations such as The Economist and the Boston Globe, are ranked by Real Clear Politics and FiveThirtyEight as more accurate than some DNC ‘certified’ polls,” the campaign stated.

Billionaire Tom Steyer, who easily made the donor count after pouring in millions of his own money into advertisements, also had issues with the polling criteria. Steyer needs just one more poll to qualify.

Steyer’s campaign said the committee should “expand their polling criteria to include more qualifying polling, including at least one poll in Nevada before the deadline next week.”

“As a party, we want to ensure the will of the voters is respected,” the campaign stated.

Rep. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) has called the rules restrictive, arguing the DNC is “stifling debate.”

“We’re rewarding celebrity candidates with millions of Twitter followers, billionaires who buy their way onto the debate stage, and candidates who have been running for president for years,” Bennet said at the committee’s summer meeting on Aug. 23. “It forces campaigns to force over millions of dollars to Facebook, the same platform that let the Russians interfere in 2016, instead of harnessing the resources to talk to voters.”

Some candidates who have already qualified have said they’re OK with the rules.

“I’m a little bit biased because I’m making the fall debates, so I think the rules are fine,” businessman Andrew Yang, who has been rising in the polls, told Fox News on Aug. 26. “I think the DNC has been very fair and open and transparent.”

“The rules have been out there for us all to see for months, and if you were going to complain about the criteria, you would probably want to complain about it a little bit earlier in the process to make it seem like it’s not purely self-interested,” he said.

DNC War Room director Adrienne Watson told Fox: “The debate rules have been public for months, and candidates have been given more opportunities and more time to qualify for debates than in previous cycles.”

Besides Yang, the debate will feature former and current politicians, including the frontrunners in the polls: former Vice President Joe Biden and Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).

South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg, former Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D-Texas), former Obama administration Housing Secretary Julián Castro, and Sens. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), and Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) make up the rest of the 10.

Three contenders have dropped out recently after struggling to gain traction: Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, former Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, and Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Mass.).

The rest of the field that hasn’t qualified for the debate outside of Gabbard, Steyer, and Bullock are Rep. Tim Ryan (D-Ohio); Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.); author Marianne Williamson; former Maryland Rep. John Delaney; New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio; former Pennsylvania Rep. Joe Sestak; Rep. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.); and Miramar, Florida, Mayor Wayne Messam.

Correction: A previous version of this article incorrectly stated the deadline to qualify. It is Aug. 28. Epoch Times regrets the error.