Democracy Activist Urges Hong Kong Voters to Ignore Dec. 19 Election

Democracy Activist Urges Hong Kong Voters to Ignore Dec. 19 Election
Pro-democracy activist Nathan Law speaks to the media out side the Court of Final Appeal after he and Joshua Wong's (not pictured) bail application were successful at Hong Kong's highest court on Oct. 24, 2017. (Isaac Lawrence/AFP via Getty Images)
Reuters
12/5/2021
Updated:
12/5/2021

LONDON—Hong Kong democracy activist Nathan Law called on voters in his home city to ignore a legislative election this month, the first under sweeping new rules imposed by Beijing, saying they should not lend the vote any legitimacy.

The communist regime in Beijing announced in March broad changes to the former British colony’s electoral system, reducing the number of directly elected representatives and increasing the number of Beijing-approved officials in an expanded legislature.

Candidates in the election, scheduled for Dec. 19 after being postponed for more than a year due to the coronavirus, are also vetted for their patriotism.

“Just ignore them,” Law said in an interview from London at the Reuters Next conference. “We should not give any legitimacy to the election, we should not pretend we have an election—it is just a selection by Beijing.”

A spokesman for the Chinese embassy did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Law’s remarks.

Hong Kong’s chief executive Carrie Lam said in September that the aim of changes to the electoral system is to ensure only “patriots”—who are aligned with the ruling communist party—can rule the city.

Beijing has said Law is a “criminal suspect wanted by the Hong Kong police” for national security offences.

In the interview, Law, who fled Hong Kong in 2020 and was granted asylum by the United Kingdom, cast Chinese leader Xi Jinping as an “emperor” who tolerated no dissent.

The system of democracy in Hong Kong, he said, was dead but its spirit lived on in the hearts of the people.

“Democracy, if you are talking about a system, it is definitely not there—but if you are talking about the spirit of the people, fighting for democracy, it is still there.”