CEOs Cutting Back or Pausing Their ESG Efforts: KPMG Study

CEOs Cutting Back or Pausing Their ESG Efforts: KPMG Study
Pedestrians walk past the New York Stock Exchange in New York City, on July 8, 2022. (John Minchillo/AP Photo)
Andrew Moran
10/31/2022
Updated:
11/11/2022
0:00

Despite U.S. companies championing their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investments and results, many others are planning to suspend or reconsider their ESG efforts in the coming months over growing recession fears, according to accounting firm KPMG.

In October, KPMG published its 2022 U.S. CEO Outlook report, assessing a wide variety of issues businesses are expecting to face over the next 12 months, including economic turbulence, finding and retaining talent, and technological developments. The paper also looked at the ESG trend sweeping the United States and the rest of the world.

The authors of the report noted that a majority (79 percent) of the 1,300 CEOs surveyed from around the world think that the public will look to the private sector to address major social challenges rather than to governments, be it climate change or income inequality. But while this form of social investing has become integral in the private marketplace, organizations acknowledged that there’s a demand for increased reporting and transparency on ESG issues, particularly as more of the public becomes skeptical over “virtue signaling” and “greenwashing.”

The former consists of a business expressing a specific moral viewpoint to communicate an impeccable character, typically one that favors an establishment talking point. The latter is when consumers are deceived into thinking a company’s products are environmentally friendly or socially responsible.

Fumes emit from factories of Keihin Industrial Area in Kawasaki, Japan, on Dec. 1, 2009. (Koichi Kamoshida/Getty Images)
Fumes emit from factories of Keihin Industrial Area in Kawasaki, Japan, on Dec. 1, 2009. (Koichi Kamoshida/Getty Images)

But the key finding in the report is that 59 percent of CEOs say they “plan to pause or reconsider their ESG efforts in the next six months” to help prepare for an anticipated recession.

The report suggested that diminishing investment in ESG strategies “may lead to long-term financial risk,” as a possible recession tests CEOs’ commitment to the latest craze in corporate America. Seventy percent of CEOs noted that ESG efforts have improved their firms’ financial performance.

“As CEOs take steps to insulate their businesses from an upcoming recession, ESG efforts are coming under increasing financial pressure,” said Jane Lawrie, global head of corporate affairs at KPMG.

Eighty percent of CEOs expect a recession within the next 12 months, according to the KPMG survey.

Is ESG Still a Priority?

Central banks worldwide have abandoned their pandemic-era easy-money policies, with market experts warning that these tightening efforts will lead to an economic downturn in either 2023 or 2024. This type of climate will make borrowing more expensive, forcing companies and investors to tighten their belts and be more conservative with their dollars and cents.

Will ESG efforts still remain a top priority for businesses and traders in such a fiscally prudent environment?

While speaking at CNBC’s Delivering Alpha Conference in September, Lauren Taylor Wolfe, co-founder and managing partner of Impactive Capital, explained that financial performance is the chief objective for companies.

“We believe that ESG without returns is simply not sustainable,” she said. “We are exclusively focused on risk-adjusted returns.”

Meanwhile, a broad array of studies point to greater skepticism and less enthusiasm over everything related to ESG rules.

A recent Capital.com poll, for example, found that investors and traders aren’t prioritizing ESG investments. The online brokerage firm’s research indicated that 52 percent never picked a stock based on ESG factors. Nearly half (46 percent) reported not knowing how to do so, while 12 percent explained that ESG investments were too expensive.
In a separate survey from global investment manager Ninety One, 55 percent of asset owners surveyed said that the risk and return performance of their holdings remained the chief concern. Interestingly enough, 40 percent of asset owners purport that investing in funds related to ESG goals, such as climate change, will cause a reduction in their returns.
Many states across the country, including Florida, Arizona, North Dakota, West Virginia, and Kentucky, have rejected ESG strategies, divesting billions from financial institutions that make investment decisions based on the system. Wall Street appears mixed on the issue, with 45 percent of CFOs telling a CNBC survey that they supported the moves. Thirty percent stated they were neutral, while 25 percent opposed these decisions.

“I think the criticism is deserved,” Wolfe said.

Last week, Strive Asset Management, led by activist investor Vivek Ramaswamy, launched a nationwide campaign that aimed to “promote excellence over ESG priorities.” The initiative suggests that some of the world’s largest companies, such as Amazon, Citigroup, ExxonMobil, and Home Depot, maintain “untapped potential” that could be unleashed if they weren’t beholden to ESG priorities.
“Everyday Americans have extraordinary yet unrealized power at their fingertips,”  Ramaswamy said in a statement. “They don’t just vote as citizens at the polls in two weeks. They vote every day with their investment dollars, which are too often used by other asset managers to inject political agendas into corporate America’s boardrooms.”