California has earned an “F” for its response to COVID-19 in a comprehensive study released regarding state responses to the pandemic between 2020 and 2021.
The study also ranked California 47th for its handling of the economy, education, and mortality during the pandemic.
The report (pdf) was issued by the Committee to Unleash Prosperity, a group founded by Steve Forbes and other economists to end the U.S. growth slump.
Utah ranked first in the nation for its overall response with a perfect score. Other top-ranking states were Nebraska, Vermont, Montana, South Dakota, Florida, New Hampshire, Maine, and Arkansas.
California was among five bottom-ranking states for overall response outcomes. Other low-scoring states were Illinois, New Mexico, New York, and New Jersey.
Washington received an “F-minus” grade and was ranked 50th.
“The correlation between health and economy scores is essentially zero, which suggests that states that withdrew the most from economic activity did not significantly improve health by doing so,” the study reads.
Only seven states exceeded 85 percent open schools, according to the study.
California’s schools only allowed about 19 percent of students to attend class in person, ranking the state last in this category.
“School closures may ultimately prove to be the most costly policy decision of the pandemic era in both economic and mortality terms,” the study reads.
Unlike economic impacts or deaths associated with the pandemic, closing public schools was entirely under the control of policymakers. Nearly all private schools in the nation remained open, the study found.
Wyoming kept all schools open, ranking first in in-person education, followed by Arkansas, Florida, South Dakota, and Utah. California ranked second to last in this category, followed only by Washington. Other states ranking at the bottom for in-person learning were New Mexico, Hawaii, Washington state, Maryland, and Oregon.
The study found a “strong relationship” between the states that had poor economic performance and closed schools.
Another report released during the pandemic found that school closures during 2020 were associated with 13.8 million years of life lost.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, an international economic policy group, has estimated that learning losses from pandemic-era school closures could cause a 3 percent decline in lifetime earnings.
“Disadvantaged students will almost certainly see larger impacts,” the organization reported (pdf) in September 2020.
The overall loss of just one-third of a year of learning has a long-term economic impact of $14 trillion, according to the group.
The hardest-hit states were those with economies that relied heavily on energy production and tourism, according to the report.
“Hawaii and Nevada came in last by far because of the overwhelming impact the global shutdown of tourism had on them, and energy-heavy states similarly had disproportionate unemployment rises with the collapse of global demand,” the report reads.
During the pandemic, more people moved away from four of the bottom-ranked states —California, Washington, New York, and Illinois—according to a U.S. Census report.
In 2021, California lost 367,299 in population, one of the largest domestic migration losses nationally, followed by New York and Illinois.
However, other western states gained slightly more residents during this time, as 38,347 more immigrants arrived to replace some of the losses.
California state Sen. Melissa Melendez said she wasn’t surprised by the report’s findings.
“Governor [Gavin] Newsom’s poor grade on handling COVID is no surprise when you consider all of the failures by this administration,” Melendez told The Epoch Times in an email. “It’s also not surprising when you see the thousands of Californians who have moved to other states like Florida and Texas, which did much better in [their] handling of COVID. California’s track record dealing with COVID only illustrates that it tried to lead from behind and still failed.”