Barclays Hit by $361 Million Penalty Over Issuance of Securities

Barclays Hit by $361 Million Penalty Over Issuance of Securities
The logo of Barclays bank on glass lamps outside of a branch of the bank in the City of London financial district in London on Sept. 4, 2017. (Toby Melville/Reuters)
Reuters
10/1/2022
Updated:
10/1/2022

British bank Barclays agreed to a $361 million penalty over internal control failures related to the unregistered offer and sale of “an unprecedented amount” of securities, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) said on Thursday.

The conduct concerned dates back to March this year when Barclays disclosed that it had accidentally oversold complex structured and exchange-traded notes, overshooting by about 75 percent a $20.8 billion limit on such sales it had agreed with the SEC.

The bank had failed to implement any internal controls to track such transactions in real time, the SEC found.

“While we acknowledge Barclays’ efforts to identify, disclose, and remediate this conduct, the control deficiencies and the scope of the conduct at issue here was simply staggering,” the director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, Gurbir Grewal, said in a news release on Thursday.

Barclays was not immediately available for comment on Friday. A spokesperson for Barclays, which did not admit or deny the SEC’s findings, declined to comment on Thursday.

Buyers of the notes, considered “unregistered securities,” had the right to demand Barclays buy back the products at the original price plus interest. The bank took a charge of 1.3 billion pounds in the second quarter to cover the costs of buying back the securities, denting its profits.

On Thursday, the SEC said Barclays had also agreed to pay a $200 million civil penalty for the control lapses. In addition, it agreed to pay disgorgement and interest of more than $161 million, although the regulator said that additional charge was satisfied by the buyback offer.

While the SEC settlement helps draw a line under the incident, which has been an embarrassment for Venkatakrishnan—known at the bank as “Venkat”—it still faces private litigation relating to the incident.

Barclays also still has to outline the final costs of its so-called rescission offer to buy back the securities it sold in error. Venkat told an investor event this month that it would do so in “relatively short order.”

Barclays said this month that investors had submitted claims for $7 billion out of the $17.7 billion worth of securities it over-sold.

Well-Seasoned Issuer

Under a previous enforcement settlement Barclays agreed with the SEC in 2017, the bank was stripped of its “well known seasoned issuer” status that had allowed it to sell notes in the United States with flexible filing requirements.

As a result, Barclays had to quantify the total number of securities that it anticipated offering and selling and pay registration fees for those offerings in advance. In August 2019, the bank and the SEC agreed Barclays could offer or sell approximately $20.8 billion of securities, for a period of three years.

Given this requirement, staff knew they had to keep close track of actual offers and sales of securities against the amount of registered offers and sales on a real-time basis, but the bank failed to establish a mechanism to do this, the SEC said.

Around March 9, staff realized that they had oversold the agreed amount of securities and alerted regulators a few days later, the SEC said.