A Quarter Century of Market Reform Leaves India Richer With Wider Inequality

India opened to the world in 1991 with its New Economic Policy that embraced economic liberalization and privatization. The policies lifted India’s GDP, but also widened the gap between rich and poor, explains Dilip Hiro, author of 36 books including “The Age of Aspiration: Power, Wealth, and Conflict in Globalizing India.” Services have climbed, contributing to a growing economy boosted by the internet, mobile phones, and information technology. But the government and citizens struggle to adapt to a shifting economy: Agriculture, employing about half the nation’s workers and contributing about 15 percent to GDP, is in decline. The services sector is strong, contributing about 60 percent of GDP and employing 30 percent. Hiro describes declining subsidies for the agriculture sector and chronic malnutrition among the rural population. “Increased GDP growth has come at the cost of ever-widening inequality,” he points out. He concludes that uneven distribution of economic benefits continues regardless which of two major parties is in power, and that could lead to disenchantment with globalization and global cooperation in the world’s largest democracy.
A Quarter Century of Market Reform Leaves India Richer With Wider Inequality
Employees of India software giant Infosys Technologies walk inside the company's compound in Bangalore on April 14, 2005. Dibyangshu Sarkar/AFP/Getty Images
Updated:

LONDON—The British decision to leave the European Union is seen by many as a rejection of globalization, although the thumbs down was on free movement of labor within the bloc and not on free trade or unrestricted flow of capital within. At the same time, the world’s largest democracy—India—was preparing to mark its 25th anniversary of joining the list of globalizing nations. While lifting India’s GDP, globalization has increased an already wide chasm between a rich minority and poor majority.

Over the years the New Economic Policy, or NEP, introduced by the Indian government in 1991, morphed into a compendium of economic liberalization, privatization, and opening up to the world. NEP has come to be viewed as combining India’s entry into a globalizing world with its adoption of the neoliberal model of economic development—a brainchild of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. Also known as the Washington Consensus, this model requires a government to reduce the state’s role in the economy, cut state spending and subsidies, abolish price controls, privatize public undertakings, reduce tariffs, welcome foreign direct investment, and regulate the financial sector lightly.

In India the NEP architect was Manmohan Singh, then finance minister and later prime minister, who had once served as chief trade economist at the U.N. Conference on Trade and Development, an associate of the IMF and the World Bank. Narendra Modi, the current prime minister, is also committed to implementing the NEP.

Pursuit of this policy resulted in annual economic growth breaking out of the 3 to 5 percent band of the pre-1991 era. But redistribution of the extra wealth has been skewed. Those already better off have improved their living standards further whereas the large majority who lagged behind before have stagnated or grown poorer.