An Architect’s Radical New Theory About Stonehenge

“Why would you move 75 large stones just so you could dance around twice a year? If you put a roof on it you can use it all year.”
An Architect’s Radical New Theory About Stonehenge
An illustration of Stonehenge. (Kameshkova)
2/4/2016
Updated:
2/15/2023

English landscape architect Sarah Ewbank says the prehistoric Stonehenge megaliths may once have served as supports for a wooden, two-storey roundhouse—a venue for feasting, speakers, and musicians.

Ewbank designed a small model of what she has in mind and is looking for money to build a 1:10 scale model of the structure. She says the fact she is not an archaeologist has freed her from preconceived notions and allowed her to approach the matter in a fresh way.

(<a href="http://sunhenge.uk/gallery/" target="_blank">Sarah Ewbank</a>)
(Sarah Ewbank)

Ewbank told Ancient Origins via email about her vision of Stonehenge: “I believe Stonehenge was a Bronze-age venue, a large oval hall encircled and overlooked by galleries. Interestingly, the upper level was tiered, the height of different sections reflecting the different height trilithons.”

Trilithons are structures, characteristic of Stonehenge, consisting of two vertical stones with a third stone set horizontally on top. 

A trilithon, part of Stonehenge. (AlamarPhotography/iStock)
A trilithon, part of Stonehenge. (AlamarPhotography/iStock)

“Consider both hall and galleries filled, listening to a speaker, or maybe there was feasting on the galleries with dancing below, perhaps crowds gathered to listen to singing or musicians playing, or maybe ceremonies took place to welcome in the solstices,” Ewbank continued.

She said she’s discussed her theories with other experts. Some of them agree her interpretation could be correct, but others strongly disagree and argue for the traditional view.

The sides of the building may have been made of oak and the roof of thatching, Ewbank speculates based on common ancient building materials. Of course, it is highly unlikely wood or straw would survive the thousands of years Stonehenge has existed, so finding physical evidence for her theory—other than the layout of the stones themselves—is next to impossible.

On her website, people have asked her if there is evidence of a roof. She points out that 500-year-old abbeys have roofs missing. “So don’t expect to find the timber structure lying around after 4,000 years,” she said.

“When you look at it the whole thing it fits absolutely perfectly,” she’s quoted as saying in Salisbury Journal. “I haven’t had to push one stone out of place. I have just taken all the standing stones and it all fits.”

She lists some reasons for theorizing Stonehenge was a roundhouse, including:

  • The blue-stones have grooves in them apparently for structural purposes.
  • The trilithons are spaced just right to support four large trusses (trusses are triangular structural units). The height difference between the trilithons would have allowed raising of the trusses.

In an interview with Salisbury Journal, she mentioned that having a roof on the structure would have made it useful all year, rain or shine: “Why would you move 75 large stones just so you could dance around twice a year? If you put a roof on it you can use it all year.”

Republished with permission. Read the original at Ancient Origins.

Visit the Epoch Times Beyond Science page on Facebook and subscribe to the Beyond Science newsletter to continue exploring ancient mysteries and the new frontiers of science!