Subscribe

Victims Group to Boycott Starbucks Over Firearms

Coffee chain says it is following local open-carry laws

By Amelia Pang
Epoch Times Staff
Created: February 3, 2012 Last Updated: February 9, 2012
Related articles: United States » National News
Print E-mail to a friend Give feedback

A busy Starbucks in Midtown Manhattan on Feb 2. The National Gun Victims Action Council called on its supporters to stop buying Starbucks products from Feb. 14, until the open gun policy is changed. (Benjamin Chasteen/The Epoch Times)

A busy Starbucks in Midtown Manhattan on Feb 2. The National Gun Victims Action Council called on its supporters to stop buying Starbucks products from Feb. 14, until the open gun policy is changed. (Benjamin Chasteen/The Epoch Times)

For most, Valentine’s Day is a hallmark holiday, dedicated to expressions of love and companionship between partners. One advocacy group has chosen the day as a backdrop for boycotting a renowned coffee chain and its decision to allow customers to carry sidearms.

The National Gun Victims Action Council (NGAC), a network of 14 million gun victims, their families, and supporters—including 89 peace and religious fellowships—called on its supporters to stop buying Starbucks products from Feb. 14, until the open gun policy is changed.

Calling the move an “economic lever strategy,” the NGAC states on its website that “to end the boycott will require Starbucks to ban all guns from its stores—and become a major supporter of policies to reduce gun violence.”

Starbucks is “damaging its ‘socially conscious company’ brand,” said Elliot Fineman, CEO of NGAC, in a press release. Its tolerance of customers openly carrying guns “in thousands of their stores significantly increases everyone’s risk of being a victim of gun violence.”

According to the press release, thousands have petitioned against Starbucks’ policy, and a direct appeal was made to its board. Starbucks is holding firm on its stance, saying it is just following the laws of host states.

“We comply with local laws and statutes in the communities we serve. … We abide by the laws that permit open carry in 43 U.S. states,” said a Starbucks spokesperson in an emailed statement. “Where these laws don’t exist, openly carrying weapons in our stores is prohibited.”

Starbucks added that it encourages customers to protest to government officials instead. “We are extremely sensitive to the issue of gun violence in our society and believe that supporting local laws is the right way,” the spokesperson added.

Forty-three states allow open carry of firearms, while 49 permit conceal and carry. Gun license requirements vary by state. In the state of New York, applicants must be without prior conviction for a felony or serious offense, according to the government’s handgun law website.

According to the NGAC, an Indiana study found that “many open carriers are dangerous people with extremely violent histories.” Fineman claims that open carry is one of many reasons there are 12,000 gun homicides in the United States each year, and that Starbucks’ “promotion” of open carry can have a devastating effect.

According to the NGAC, if 10 percent of the 14 million NGAC members followed through with the boycott, Starbucks’ revenue would take a hit—big time. If each customer stopped spending $8 a week on Starbucks products, the company would lose $560 million a year. Starbucks’ profit in 2009 was $562 million.

The group sees strength in numbers. “We will prevail because our side outnumbers the NRA’s extremist side by minimally 50 to 1,” states the NGAC’s website.

Gun Control Laws

“Contrary to popular opinion, the ability to carry a weapon openly does not currently derive from the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution,” said John Pierce, co-founder of OpenCarry.org, in his article; it comes from “the constitutions and statutes of the 50 states.”

According to the Open Carry website, an FBI study in 2006 found that it is not in the nature of criminals to openly carry weapons in public; they tend to conceal their weapons in order to avoid attention from police.

“Statistically speaking, citizens who are openly wearing a properly holstered handgun and willing to subject themselves to the intense law enforcement scrutiny … are not criminals,” Pierce said.

Dr. Jeremy Blanks, a senior research scientist and board member of Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws, said in an article titled “Guns vs. Crime” that data concerning gun control paints a supportive picture.

“In almost all cases, the areas in the U.S. with the fewest gun control laws and highest gun ownership also have the lowest crime levels,” stated Blanks, adding that areas with the highest restrictions—Washington, New York, and Chicago, for instance—have “some of the highest crime rates in the U.S.”

“There is no evidence to show that any [gun] laws have ever reduced crime or violence,” Blanks concluded.

The NGAC plans to continue its Starbucks boycott until the specified conditions are met. The advocacy group also plans on boycotting various partners of Starbucks, such as Barnes & Noble, Nordstrom, and Hyatt.

California Pizza Kitchen, IKEA, Disney, and several other retail stores have banned customers from bringing handguns and rifles into their establishments, despite state laws.



  • http://profile.yahoo.com/C2JMYITUDLWHKK32SCE6UBOJ54 Uncle Lar

    So in a nutshell, the anti gun folks can’t get the laws changed to what they want so they’re trying to get Starbucks to restrict their customer’s rights instead, correct? Take something that is legal on the sidewalk in front of the store and forbid customers from acting the same once in the door. Sounds like NGAC simply wants to circumvent state law to restrict legal actions, something I’d expect of a radical fringe group such as the KKK.

  • Anonymous

    Starbucks is being disingenuous.  The fact is that local law also allows them to ban guns.  Therefore, they have MADE A CONSCIOUS CHOICE as to which local law they want to follow and have chosen to allow guns i.e. TO SUPPORT THE  NRA’s LETHAL PRO GUN AGENDA. 

    BTW, Dr. Jeremy Blanks staement is incorrect.  All the responsible factual data says just the opposite.  Loose gun laws + more guns = more gun violence and more crime.

    • jarhead1982

      Oh I am sorry, what drug induced fantasy data are you speaking of?

      We have some excellent examples in Australia, Canada & England where in 1997 they banned guns. Their murders didnt go down, their violent crime rates increased 2 to 4 times between 1997 and today.

      How can that be, especially when one reviews THEIR GOVERNMENT DATABASES to get that information.

      AIC.GOV, STATCAN, HOME OFFICE UK

      So much for less guns = less violence.

      Then a review of the FBI UCR of the US shows during that same time frame, 9 mil more households with firearms, 30% reduction inviolent crime, 20% reduction in murders, 13-16 more states reinstate concealed carry to 49 total, 35 states reinstate concealed carry in eateries serving alcohol, 4 states w 72 universities reinstate concealed carry all without the associated bloodbaths you anti freedom extremists wail about for oh like the millionth time.

      So much for more guns = more violence.

      But hey, you have government data to refute that government data, uh nope, you never do!

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Wayne-Crawford/1518874604 Wayne Crawford

      If you claim that Dr. Blanks is incorrect, please cite the studies that prove your point.

    • Anonymous

      Exactly to what “responsible factual data” are you referring? Gun ownership is way up. More states are “shall issue” for carry purposes than ever before. And according to the FBI statistics (an unbiased source), the murder rate and gun violence rates are the lowest since 1965. Gun control has not, does not, and will never work.

    • Rich7553

      Sorry, but you’re incorrect. Cite your “factual” data. I’ll wait.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jack-Burton/100001450770119 Jack Burton

    Another epic fail on the people/gun controllers part. The gun owning community has come together and pledged by the tens of millions to drink at Starbucks that day. It will probably be their best day in the history of the company. Whom do you think they’ll support better. The people who actually drink there… or the people who don’t. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=645908925 Michael De Armond

    I will be buying Starbucks for ALL my friends and family this Valentine’s Day…..SPECIFICALLY because anti-freedom groups want me to boycott…..I will be posting to Facebook to increase the numbers of people who will join me.

  • http://www.facebook.com/big.gay.al Albert Lowe

    Well, I don’t normally drink coffee all that much, but on that day, I plan to be in attendance, and I will buy something from Starbuck’s as a “thank you” for simply following the law.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002865654457 Wayne Cummins

    If Starbucks ever caves-in to the anti freedom crowd, they will lose far more customers than they would gain.

    Gunssavelives.net

  • Barry Hirsh

    Saul Alinsky socialist bullying tactics.

    Resistance is MANDATORY.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_L2WXENZ3H2AGPWBSK5HGIRUSX4 Anonymous

    ” All the responsible factual data says just the opposite.  Loose gun laws + more guns = more gun violence and more crime. ”
     
    John Lott’s says just the opposite
     
    “…TO SUPPORT THE  NRA’s LETHAL PRO GUN AGENDA”
     
    Hanky-twisting diatribes like yours don’t help further your side of the debate.

    • Anonymous

      John’n Lott’s “research” is an utter scientific fiction. 

      • Rich7553

        Do you say that because you’ve actually read it or because some gun-hater website told you so?

  • WeaselClubber

    ” All the responsible factual data says just the opposite.  Loose gun laws + more guns = more gun violence and more crime. ”

    John Lott’s says just the opposite

    “…TO SUPPORT THE  NRA’s LETHAL PRO GUN AGENDA”

    Hanky-twisting diatribes like yours don’t help further your side of the debate.

  • Anonymous

    Anti-gunners have been “boycotting” Starbucks since 2010. Since that time, Starbucks’ profit continues to grow. February 14, 2012 will probably set a profit record.

  • Jim Davis

    Everyone I know who carries a gun daily went to Starbucks today… this boycott backfired, big time.  It’s pretty ironic that a “victims group” who mourns those who couldn’t defend themselves, is actively trying to disarm others so they can’t defend themselves either.



Selected Topics from The Epoch Times

Harvey Frommer on Sports