Top Court’s Upholding of Extreme Intoxication Defence Draws Mixed Reactions

Top Court’s Upholding of Extreme Intoxication Defence Draws Mixed Reactions
The Supreme Court of Canada in Ottawa on May 11, 2022. The Canadian Press/Sean Kilpatrick
Lee Harding
Updated:

A Supreme Court of Canada ruling that someone too impaired by drugs to be capable of self-control isn’t criminally guilty has caused mixed reactions and a call for new legislation by some.

The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) ruling of R. v. Brown concerned a former Calgary university student who, at a party in Calgary in January 2018, drank alcohol and consumed “magic mushrooms,” which contain a drug that can cause hallucinations. Around 3:45 a.m., while naked, Matthew Winston Brown broke into a nearby home where he violently attacked a woman and left her with permanent injuries.
Lee Harding
Lee Harding
Author
Lee Harding is a journalist and think tank researcher based in Saskatchewan, and a contributor to The Epoch Times.
Related Topics