Teenage recipients of COVID-19 vaccines faced an elevated risk of serious adverse events, including appendicitis, after a second dose, researchers said in a new study.
Following a first dose, there were no significant increases in adverse events, the scientists said. An age-adjusted analysis identified an increased incidence of appendicitis and allergic reactions, but the small number of events means those increases should be “interpreted cautiously,” they wrote.
In contrast, after the second dose, there was a higher incidence of allergic reactions, swollen lymph nodes, and heart inflammation. When isolating people without reported COVID-19 infections, an elevated risk of epilepsy and convulsions also appeared.
The Norwegian researchers restricted their primary analysis to events occurring within two to 42 days after vaccination, depending on the type of event. They acknowledged that the risk windows may be too brief, as estimates of risk increased for certain events after the elapsed time.
The research was funded by the Norwegian Institute of Public Health. Several authors reported receiving funding from pharmaceutical companies, such as GlaxoSmithKline. Neither Pfizer nor Moderna was listed as paying any of the scientists.
German Tapia, a researcher with the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, and coauthors said that the study found that “the number of observed outcomes and statistically significant associations were generally low, with some exceptions.” They called for more studies on adolescents to explore age-specific adverse events, particularly for new mRNA vaccines.
Pfizer and Moderna did not respond to requests for comment.
The Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, based in the United States, said in a March 30 post on X that the study showed that “a clear ‘dose-dependent’ safety signal exists for cardiac inflammation in teens” and said authorities should withdraw the vaccines from the market.

Jeffrey Morris, a professor of public health at the University of Pennsylvania who was not involved with the new study, said in response to the foundation that he believed the study “basically affirms what the other papers have already showed” and that the benefits of the vaccines outweigh the risks.







