Business owners Caroline Mostertman and Ted Dykman initiated a lawsuit in December 2021 against the City of Abbotsford, the Fraser Valley Regional District (FVRD), the Province of British Columbia, and three unnamed companies responsible for monitoring for flooding at the respective municipal, regional, and provincial levels.
According to the statement of claim, not only did the defendants fail to warn of the impending flood in a timely manner, they “also failed to implement emergency measures and warnings when they knew or ought to have known that a flood impacting the Sumas Prairie was the foreseeable consequence of the weather preceding the Sumas Flood.”
“Residents of the Sumas Prairie, who had not been adequately notified of the impending disaster, watched helplessly as ravenous floodwaters tore through their land, burying their personal property and destroying their crops and farmland,” the claim says.
Mostertman, who co-owns a farm, a winery, a distillery company, and a plant and fish nursery, told The Epoch Times that even two days’ notice would have helped to mitigate losses.
“We would have saved our entire inventory as opposed to losing probably more than half of it. We certainly could have saved all the equipment, trucks, and tractors and trailers, all the electronic stuff. Being on the farm and having access to heavy equipment and trailers, you can load an awful lot of stuff very quickly and move it out very quickly,” she said.
Extensive DamageSouth of the border in Washington state, the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration issued its first general warning of flooding on Nov. 8, its first flash flood warning on Nov. 10, and the highest-level flood warnings beginning on Nov. 11. But B.C. residents didn’t receive their first general warning until Nov. 13.
Early in the flooding, the City of Abbotsford chose not to use the provincial emergency alert system and instead decided to make phone calls directly to the households in the Sumas Prairie area.
“Those 300 people know there’s an emergency just by looking out their window, so we didn’t want to alarm the whole city,” Mayor Henry Braun said at a press conference on Nov. 17.
At the end of November, Braun estimated that damage to his city alone amounted to $1 billion. In December, the Insurance Bureau of Canada said the flooding in southern B.C. was estimated to have caused $450 million in insured damage, but added that given the scale of the disaster, with major highways and other public infrastructure destroyed and supply chains choked, the overall economic losses will be much higher than the insured loss figure.
In addition, many of the affected residents, including Mostertman in the Sumas Prairie, have no flood insurance coverage due to being located in high-risk flood areas and floodplains.
Mosterman said she also could not qualify for the provincial disaster relief program, which she calls “a joke.” It disqualifies any business that grossed $1 million or more in a year, even if the business lost money, and that excludes most agricultural businesses common to the area.
Dairy farmer Ted Dykman lists five vehicles, several electric pumps, motors, hay, and grain among his flood losses.
Flooding Was ‘Preventable’The Sumas Prairie sits on low-lying fertile flatland that used to be under the waters of a lake called Sumas Lake. The federal government drained the lake in the early 1920s to transform the lake bed into productive farmland. The statement of claim notes that the area is a floodplain known for being susceptible to devastating floods. The three most notable floods occurred in 1894 and 1948, when the Fraser River overflowed, and in 1990, when the Nooksack River, which begins in Washington state, overflowed.
Vancouver-based lawyer Anthony Vecchio filed the class action suit in the B.C. Supreme Court on Dec. 23 on behalf of all those who owned or had an interest in property affected by the Sumas Prairie flood.
B.C.’s Emergency Program Act protects governments from liability for actions they took or failed to take in an emergency unless gross negligence takes place, but Vecchio believes that that is what occurred.
“This was predictable. It was obvious and was preventable,’ Vecchio said in an interview.
“It meets the definition of gross negligence. They monitored, they knew there was a risk, [but] they failed to shore up the diking, [which] they could have done. This is a very strong case. The community deserved better.”
Vecchio added that “to the extent that people are vulnerable, it [raises] the standard of care for the government. That’s basically the law in British Columbia.”
The plaintiffs are seeking general, special, and punitive damages and relief for the legal costs of the lawsuit.
The Epoch Times reached out to the defendants for comment. The City of Abbotsford did not reply. Spokesperson Angelique Crowther of the FVRD said they had “no comment on pending lawsuits.”
Melody Wey at Emergency Management BC replied by email, stating: “The Province takes the health and safety of British Columbians seriously in emergency situations. As the issue is before the courts, we are not in a position to comment further.”