Plibersek ‘Not Speculating’ on Water Buybacks as New Murray-Darling Plan Moves Forward

Plibersek ‘Not Speculating’ on Water Buybacks as New Murray-Darling Plan Moves Forward
Australian Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek speaks during House of Representatives Question Time at Parliament House in Canberra on Feb. 15, 2023. (AAP Image/Lukas Coch)
Henry Jom
8/23/2023
Updated:
8/23/2023
0:00

Federal Water Minister Tanya Plibersek has said she would not want to “start speculating” on how much the federal government would be spending on water buybacks following the announcement of the new Murray-Darling Basin water plan.

“We’re simply not going to start speculating even about the number of gigalitres of water we’re going to buy because to do that risks distorting the water market,” Ms. Plibersek said.

“What we'll say to you is we’re determined to deliver the Murray-Darling Basin Plan in full.

“What we know for certain is just as we have had a few years that have been too wet in many parts of Australia, the next drought is around the corner.”

In the October 2022 budget, funding allocations to meet water-saving targets for the Murray-Darling Basin were undisclosed “due to commercial sensitivities.”

Under the scheme, the federal government buys water rights from irrigators using the Murray-Darling Basin for environmental reasons—an area considered to be “Australia’s Food Bowl.”

Jan Beer, a representative from the Upper Murray River Catchment Association in Victoria, previously told The Epoch Times that water buybacks will impact farmers’ ability to produce and export food.

“If they buy back that water or they take that further water out of the consumptive pool, then food production and food security will be greatly affected because the irrigators get the very last of what’s left in the consumptive bucket of water,” Ms. Beer said.

Water buybacks have been a controversial issue since the Murray Darling Basin Plan was legislated in 2012, with Victoria, New South Wales (NSW), the federal opposition, the National Farmers Federation and the National Irrigators Council against the move.

Meanwhile, federal opposition water spokeswoman Perin Davey said the extended deadlines were “cautiously welcomed” but warned the government not to immediately resort to buybacks.

The legislation will be introduced into federal parliament in the coming weeks, with both houses sitting for two weeks starting Sept. 4.

New Murray-Darling Water Plan

The refusal from the minister comes after a new plan will give basin states three extra years to complete the infrastructure projects needed to deliver the Murray-Darling Basin Plan in full.

This comes after Ms. Plibersek was advised by the Murray Darling Basin Authority in July that the $13 billion plan would not be completed by the 2024 deadline.

Speaking at a press conference in Sydney on Aug. 22, Ms. Plibersek said the federal government had struck a deal with Queensland, New South Wales, the ACT, Victoria, and South Australia to deliver on the plan.

“Today, I’m very pleased to announce that after many months of negotiations with the Basin states and territory, we have stuck—we have struck a historic agreement for a way forward,” Ms. Plibersek said.

“This way forward will deliver on the whole of the Murray-Darling Basin Plan, including the 450 gigalitres of additional water for the environment. What we’re proposing is more time, more money, more options, and more accountability.”

Basin states will now have until 2026 to complete water infrastructure projects, while the additional 450 gigalitres of water to be recovered through “efficiency measures” will be extended to 2027.

Under the current plan, the basin states and territory agreed to take 2,750 gigalitres of water from irrigated agriculture and allow it to flow into the basin by 2024, with a further 450 gigalitres to be added in the future. So far, more than 2,100 gigalitres of water have been relocated.

Meanwhile, Ms. Plibersek said she would also amend the Water Act so that the federal government can purchase water beyond the current 1,500 gigalitre cap in order to recover water back into the environment, adding that voluntary water buybacks would complement the infrastructure projects.

Victoria Not On Board With Revised Plan

The Victorian government is the only basin state that has not signed up to the new plan due to concerns that water buybacks will have negative socio-economic impacts on the state’s agriculture sector.

By not signing the deal, Ms. Plibersek warned that Victoria would not have access to new funds, including compensation to give affected communities, as well as face the prospect of higher levels of water buybacks.

Environment Victoria CEO Jono La Nauze criticised the Victorian government for not signing up to the deal.

“By not signing up, the Victorian government is saying they don’t support keeping Australia’s most important river system alive,” Mr. La Nauze said.

“The water recovery targets in the Basin Plan aren’t about restoring a pristine environment, but simply giving the river a bare minimum for survival.”

On Aug. 3, a report published by Environment Victoria said the state’s opposition to water buybacks, including other schemes, has made it difficult to meet the scheme’s water targets.
Victorian Farmers Federation (VFF) President Emma Germano said the deal done “behind closed doors” between the Commonwealth and state governments, which excluded the Victorian Government, would have a devastating impact on Victorian farming communities.

“This deal not only undermines the livelihoods of Victorian farmers but also threatens the long-term sustainability of our regions,” Ms. Germano said.

“We are staring down the barrel of job losses across northern Victoria in farming and food manufacturing, increased cost of production, and increased prices at the supermarket checkout.

“Victorian farmers have done all the heavy lifting in delivering the 2,100GL that has so far been recovered under the plan. This has been done to the economic and social detriment of our communities. In no world should Victoria be expected to do any more.”

Victorian Water Minister Harriet Shing said nothing in the new deal changed that, and the state supported the return of water to the environment but only if it met the agreed socio-economic requirements.

New South Wales is also opposed to water buybacks but will be receiving federal funding under the deal to reduce the need for water buybacks.

Henry Jom is a reporter for The Epoch Times, Australia, covering a range of topics, including medicolegal, health, political, and business-related issues. He has a background in the rehabilitation sciences and is currently completing a postgraduate degree in law. Henry can be contacted at [email protected]
twitter
Related Topics