Pillar Two of AUKUS More Important Than Nuclear Subs, but Is Floundering, Says Analyst

Director of Strategic Analysis Australia Michael Shoebridge says the technology exchange part of AUKUS matters more, but is in trouble.
Pillar Two of AUKUS More Important Than Nuclear Subs, but Is Floundering, Says Analyst
The sun rises over a Royal Australian Navy submarine berthed at HMAS Stirling in Garden Island, Australia, on Jan. 21, 2021. POIS Yuri Ramsey/Australian Defence Force via Getty Images
Rex Widerstrom
Daniel Y. Teng
Updated:
0:00

Pillar Two of AUKUS, which involves the exchange of technology between the United States, Australia, and the UK, has more potential benefit to Australia than Pillar One—the purchase of nuclear-propelled submarines—but it has become “bogged down” by regulation says a leading strategic analyst.

Michael Shoebridge, director of Strategic Analysis Australia, says the United States does not possess the capacity to deliver the submarines it has promised Australia. This echoes concerns expressed recently in a report to Congress from the U.S. Congressional Research Service.

Rex Widerstrom is a New Zealand-based reporter with over 40 years of experience in media, including radio and print. He is currently a presenter for Hutt Radio.
Related Topics