Court Gives Teacher Critical of Transgender Books Go-Ahead for Defamation Case Against School Board, Chair

Court Gives Teacher Critical of Transgender Books Go-Ahead for Defamation Case Against School Board, Chair
School library books in a file photo. (John Moore/Getty Images)
Chandra Philip
11/25/2023
Updated:
11/25/2023
0:00

An Ontario court has ruled in favour of a teacher whose presentation at a school board meeting was shut down when she raised questions about how some books made it seem “simple” or “cool” to transition genders.

Carolyn Burjoski made her presentation on Jan. 17, 2022, at a Waterloo Regional District School Board (WRDSB) meeting about books that she said made it “seem simple or even cool to take puberty blockers and opposite sex hormones,” according to court documents. Trustees told her that her comments may be violating human rights legislation and refused to let her continue.
“What happened here should not happen in a democratic society,” Ontario Superior Court Justice James Ramsay said in his decision, the National Post reported.

Justice Ramsay on Nov. 23 handed down his ruling on the school board’s quest to throw out a defamation lawsuit Ms. Burjoski filed against the board and former chair, Scott Piatkowski.

“The Human Rights Code does not prohibit public discussion of issues related to transgenderism or minors and transgenderism. It does not prohibit public discussion of anything,” he said.

The Epoch Times attempted to reach Mr. Piatkowski and the board but did not hear back by publication time.

School Board Blocks Presentation

Ms. Burjoski has shared her story on a website called cancelledteacher.com, which details what happened during the school board meeting.

She said she had been a teacher in the region for 20 years when she attempted to give a presentation questioning some of the books available to students.

“I was ejected from a Board of Trustees meeting for criticizing the age appropriateness of sexual content in children’s books in elementary school libraries,” she said on the website.

She was also expelled from her classroom and became part of a disciplinary investigation for her comments.

Mr. Piatkowski previously said he cut Ms. Burjoski’s presentation short because he believed her words to be in violation of the Ontario Human Rights Code. In subsequent media interviews, he said Ms. Burjoski’s comments were “transphobic.”

“He attributed to me remarks that I did not make, characterized them as hateful, and accused me of violating the Human Rights Code,” Ms. Burjoski said.

“The Board quickly removed the video of the meeting from its website so people could not hear for themselves what I actually said.”

In response, Ms. Burjoski filed a defamation lawsuit, and on Nov. 23 the court dismissed the board’s application to throw out the case, the National Post reported. Ms. Burjoski was also granted $30,000 in costs.

Justice Ramsay said she should be permitted to proceed with her case as the comments made against her were “defamatory.”

“They accused her of breaching the Human Rights Code, questioning the right of trans persons to exist, and engaging in speech that included hate. She did not do any of those things,” the court said.

“The chairman of the board acted with malice or at least, with a reckless disregard for the truth. He had made an embarrassingly erroneous and arbitrary decision to silence a legitimate expression of opinion and he was widely criticized for it. It is not a stretch to infer that, realizing that, he tried to justify himself with the public by assassinating the plaintiff’s character.”

Ms. Burjoski said she suffered trauma as a result of the incident, and decided to retire early. She said she is speaking out to protect other teachers.

“I believe this incident has exposed a serious problem—that school boards are using language and human rights legislation as weapons to silence anyone who questions their policies.”

Action to Protect Freedom of Speech

Ms. Burjoski has also filed an action against the WRDSB asking the court to overturn the decision to stop her presentation.

“The Board and its Chair violated my right to freedom of expression guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms,” she said. “I am also asking the court to order the Board to allow me to return to the Trustee’s meeting where I hope to deliver my presentation in full.”

On her website, she said she was originally given 10 minutes for her presentation but was cut off after four minutes.

During her presentation, she said she was concerned about some school library books that dealt with topics such as a 12-year-old finding happiness after undergoing gender transition and a Grade 3 student declaring his “asexual” identity after wondering why he’s “not thinking about naked girls.”

She is represented by Jorge Pineda, a lawyer from the Justice Centre For Constitutional Freedoms who has argued that the WRDSB violated Ms. Burjoski’s charter-protected rights to freedom of expression by cutting her presentation short.

A GoFundMe set up for Ms. Burjoski has raised over $65,000 as of Nov. 25, 2023.