One Nation Says Pacific Nations Can’t Take Australian Aid and China’s Money

Hanson’s position vastly differs from previous governments and the Department of Foreign Affairs, which largely subscribe to a ’soft diplomacy' approach.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese (R) reacts as Papua New Guinea's Prime Minister James Marape speaks during a press conference in Sydney, Australia, on Dec. 12, 2024. David Gray/AFP via Getty Images

Australian One Nation leader Pauline Hanson has vowed to scrutinise—and potentially cut—foreign aid to Pacific nations that double dip by receiving aid from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

Australia is the largest donor to developing Pacific nations and has, in recent years, been locked in a donations arms race with the CCP as the communist regime vies for influence in the region.

Meanwhile, Pacific leaders have largely opted out of taking a side in the debate, preferring to receive aid and overtures from Beijing and democratic nations like Australia and the United States.

The conservative-leaning Hanson was critical of corruption levels in countries like Papua New Guinea (PNG), which ranked 142 out of 182 countries on the Corruption Perceptions Index.

PNG, one of the largest Pacific nations, receives about 62 percent of its foreign aid from Australia (about A$818 million), followed by the Asian Development Bank and China (4 percent or $56.4 million).

“[I have] 130,000 Australians living in poverty here who can’t get a roof over their head, and we’re giving foreign aid to countries that don’t respect it, and corruption that’s happening there—that needs change,” Hanson told the National Press Club on June 17 in a major address shedding more light on her party’s policy direction.

Conservative-leaning One Nation leader Pauline Hanson addresses the National Press Club in Canberra, Australia on June 17, 2026. AAP Image/Lukas Coch

“The amount of money that we’ve helped with our Pacific partners ... only to still allow the Chinese to come in there with their Belt and Road project ... that’s like they’ve [the Pacific] said to us, ‘Up you, we’re actually going to take the Chinese and have them here,’” Hanson said.

“There has to be give and take. China is our biggest concern, I think that we need to really look at the relationship that they [the Pacific nations] have with China and how it’s going to impact us.”

Support for Hanson’s party has continued to surge since late last year with recent polls showing One Nation is now more popular than the current Labor government.

In response to Hanson’s pledge, PNG’s Foreign Minister Justin Tkatchenko, who incidentally is in Adelaide, Australia called her comments “false and defaming.”

“It’s uncalled for and totally irresponsible for her to say such a thing when she doesn’t know the truth,” Tkatchenko said.

Hanson’s position vastly differs from previous governments from both sides and the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, which largely subscribes to a “soft diplomacy“ approach.

This strategy aims to gently influence Pacific leaders while avoiding accusations of “talking down” to the former colonial countries.

This approach has manifested in the form of Australian and U.S. taxpayer funds backing initiatives like police training, military support, economic growth projects, and infrastructure funding, while avoiding publicly pushing the Pacific to take a stance on the CCP.

Part of this approach was also realised in late 2024 when the Albanese Labor government signed off a taxpayer-backed $600 million funding deal for a rugby league team in the PNG capital of Port Moresby.

Albanese stated at the time that the initiative aims to foster grassroots development, economic growth, and regional unity.