Hunt Makes Triple-Lock Pledge but Refuses to Commit to Waspi Women Payouts

The Chancellor said the safeguard would be kept throughout the next parliament under the Conservatives.
Hunt Makes Triple-Lock Pledge but Refuses to Commit to Waspi Women Payouts
Chancellor of the Exchequer Jeremy Hunt is seen on a large screen at BBC Broadcasting House in London as he appears on the BBC One current affairs programme, Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, on March 24, 2024. (Stefan Rousseau/PA Wire)
3/24/2024
Updated:
3/24/2024
0:00

Jeremy Hunt has promised the triple lock for pensions will be included in the Tory election manifesto but refused to commit to compensation for so-called Waspi women.

The chancellor said the safeguard would be kept throughout the next parliament under the Conservatives, suggesting the party was confident it would be able to pay for it.

“Absolutely. We made that commitment to pensioners and we think it’s a very important one,” he told the BBC’s “Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg” programme when asked if he could make the guarantee.

The triple lock refers to the commitment to raise the state pension every year by wage growth, inflation, or 2.5 percent, whichever is highest.

However, Mr. Hunt declined to promise compensation for women hit by changes to state pension eligibility, amid accusations the government failed to adequately inform those born in the 1950s about an increase in the entitlement age.

Speaking to broadcasters, the Chancellor denied pushing the decision to the right for a future administration to deal, as Labour enjoys a sustained double-digit lead in opinion polls ahead of this year’s election.

He said the issue highlighted by the Women Against State Pension Inequality (Waspi) campaign was “genuinely more complicated” than others in which compensation has been promised, like the infected blood disaster and the Post Office Horizon scandal.

It comes after a long-awaited report by the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) that found the changes to the state pension age were not communicated adequately and those affected should receive an apology and compensation.

Asked whether it was responsible for the Government to leave “huge unpaid bills” to the next parliament, he said: “We had the ombudsman’s report on Thursday, but we’ve also had a report from the High Court and Court of Appeal in 2020 that says the Department for Work and Pensions behaved completely within the law and didn’t discriminate.

“So it appears to say something different and we do need to get to the bottom of that apparent difference between the two.”

He added: “We want to resolve it as quickly as we can, but there’s no secret vault of money.

“The money we would pay in compensation has to come from other taxpayers, so we do have to take time to get this fair.”

Campaigners have demanded action over the report, warning Prime Minister Rishi Sunak will be on a “sticky wicket” seeking votes from Waspi women when he goes to the country later this year if he heeds the ombudsman’s findings.

But amid straitened public finances, politicians on both sides have shied away from commitments to payouts, with neither Labour nor the Tories having issued a formal response to Thursday’s report.

The PHSO suggested compensation could cost between £3.5 billion and £10.5 billion, although campaigners are pushing for a higher figure.