Home Office Explores Voluntary Deportation to Rwanda

The department confirmed that it could ask those who don’t have the right to remain to move to Rwanda if they can’t be deported to their home countries.
Home Office Explores Voluntary Deportation to Rwanda
The Hope Hostel, where migrants will stay after arriving from the UK on a deportation flight, in Kigali, Rwanda, on June 16, 2022. (Victoria Jones/PA Media)
Lily Zhou
3/13/2024
Updated:
3/13/2024
0:00

Foreigners who don’t have the right to stay in the UK but can’t be deported to their home countries could be asked to move to Rwanda under a new scheme, the Home Office confirmed on Tuesday.

It comes after The Times of London reported that failed asylum seekers, foreign criminals, and other migrants with no right to remain in the UK could be offered thousands of pounds if they go to the east African country voluntarily.

According to the outlet, the scheme will use the existing structure designed for small boat arrivals that hasn’t been used because the policy to relocate them is yet to overcome legal roadblocks.

It also claimed that the new scheme will use the existing voluntary returns system that includes an “assisted departure” mechanism that involves paying an eligible person up to £3,000 to help them resettle in their home country.

The Home Office did not confirm any potential payment, but said it is looking at voluntary relocations to Rwanda.

In a statement, a spokesperson said: “In the last year, 19,000 people were removed voluntarily from the UK and this is an important part of our efforts to tackle illegal migration.

“We are exploring voluntary relocations for those who have no right to be here, to Rwanda, who stand ready to accept people who wish to rebuild their lives and cannot stay in the UK.

“This is in addition to our Safety of Rwanda Bill and Treaty which, when passed, will ensure people who come to the UK illegally are removed to Rwanda.”

Shadow immigration minister Stephen Kinnock accused ministers of “resorting to paying people” to go to Rwanda upon realising their original deportation scheme “has no chance of succeeding.”

“We know from the treaty that capacity in Rwanda is very limited, so ministers should now explain what this new idea means for the scheme as it was originally conceived, and they should also make clear how many people they expect to send on this basis, and what the cost will be,” the Labour frontbencher said.

“There have been so many confused briefings around the Rwanda policy that the public will be forgiven for treating this latest wheeze with a degree of scepticism,” he added.

The revelation comes after the government suffered a series of defeats in the House of Lords on the the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill.
The Rwanda bill was designed to minimise the chance for domestic and international courts to block deportation flights by having Parliament declare that Rwanda is a safe country in general, but peers have inserted 10 amendments into the bill, including a provision to allow courts to consider the safety of Rwanda.

Other changes to the bill include an assurance that the UK must maintain “full compliance with domestic and international law,” and that Rwanda will only be considered safe if and when its treaty with the UK is “fully implemented and adhered to in practice.”

The changes will allow individuals to legally challenge their removal if they feel they have been wrongly labelled an adult. Another amendment would prevent the relocation of people who had previously supported British military overseas or been a modern slavery or human trafficking victim.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has previously warned against the “appointed” House of Lords frustrating “the will of the people” as expressed by the “elected” House of Commons.

The drastically changed bill has received an unopposed third reading on Tuesday and is set to enter the so-called ping-pong stage in which the two houses of Parliament will make final tweaks to the bill.

When the bill was last in the Commons it was criticised from both opposition parties, which oppose the Rwanda policy, and Tory rebels believe the bill is not tough enough to end what they call legal merry-go-rounds that frustrate deportation.

Evgenia Filimianova contributed to this report.