Federal Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault says Ottawa has decided to stop investing in new roads and highways, saying the country’s existing network is “perfectly adequate.” Amid questioning and criticism by premiers, Mr. Guilbeault later said he specifically meant “large” road projects.
The minister said the Liberal government believes that federal investment in public transit, active transit such as walking and biking, along with territorial planning and densification means economic, social, and human development goals can be met “without more enlargement of the road network.”
The money that has usually been used to invest in asphalt and concrete for roads would be better invested in projects to fight climate change and adapt to its impacts, he added.
Mr. Guilbeault said funding more road networks would encourage more car usage, in turn increasing congestion and prompting more calls for road expansion. He said around a quarter of Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions comes from transportation, and Ottawa has been heavily funding programs to get more Canadians to use public or active transit instead of private vehicles.
Mr. Guilbeault also said being overly reliant on electric-powered transportation to solve climate change would be “an error, a false utopia that will let us down over the long term.”
“Of course we’re funding roads,” Mr. Guilbeault said.
“We have programs to fund roads, but we have said—and maybe I should have been more specific in the past—is that we don’t have funds for large projects like the Troisième lien that the CAQ [Coalition Avenir Québec party] has been trying to do for many years,” he added.
The Troisième lien is a road tunnel project aimed at linking Quebec City to its south shore across the St. Lawrence River.
“Can we return to the real world, Minister Guilbeault?” Ms. Smith said on Feb. 14.
Infrastructure Spending
After the Liberals under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau first came to power in late 2015, their first budget, released March 2016, proposed spending $11.9 billion on infrastructure over five years. This included $3.4 billion over three years to upgrade and improve public transit systems and $5 billion over five years for water, wastewater, and green infrastructure. The rest was for social infrastructure such as affordable housing and recreational infrastructure. No money was specifically allocated to new road networks.That funding emphasized investments in public transportation like buses, subways, bicycle paths, and other public transit infrastructure, and not in new roads. The funding was also meant to reduce pollution by switching public transit systems to “cleaner electrical power, including supporting the use of zero-emission vehicles and related infrastructure.”
