This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact The Epoch Times Reprints.

The Epoch Times
The Epoch Times
AD
The Epoch Times
Social Issues

Female-Only App Founder Loses Appeal in Transgender Discrimination Case

Sall Grover, who excluded a transgender woman from her female-only app, has been ordered to pay increased compensation following her unsuccessful appeal.
Google LogoMark Us Preferred on Google
Female-Only App Founder Loses Appeal in Transgender Discrimination Case
Giggle for Girls founder Sall Grover is seen during a break at the Federal Court in Sydney, Australia, on April 11, 2024. AAP Image/Bianca De Marchi
Crystal-Rose Jones
Crystal-Rose Jones
5/15/2026|Updated: 5/15/2026
0:00

The founder of the female-only app Giggle for Girls has lost an appeal against an earlier ruling that found she discriminated against a male-to-female trans person after blocking her from her app.

In 2024, the Federal Court of Australia found Giggle app owner Sall Grover had “indirectly discriminated” against transgender woman Roxanne Tickle by denying her access to the app based on her appearance in her profile photo.

Grover was then order to pay Tickle $10,000 (US$7,200) in damages, with the court finding that the discrimination occurred despite Tickle holding a female birth certificate in Queensland after undergoing gender surgery.

The judge also found that the meaning of “sex” could change.

The judge said the concept of sex had broadened “especially by reason of the wide scope that now exists for legally changing the sex of a person on official birth records.”

However, Grover appealed the court’s decision, with the outcome of that appeal—alongside Tickle’s counter-appeal—determined on May 15, 2026.

Related Stories
The Epoch Times
NSW Lawmaker Condemns Push for All-Gender Toilets in Public Buildings
The Epoch Times
Lifeblood Expands Blood Donation Eligibility for LGBT Community

The full bench of the Federal Court, led by Justice Melissa Perry, dismissed Grover’s appeal while upholding Tickle’s cross-appeal, finding that Grover’s conduct constituted direct discrimination rather than “indirect discrimination.”

While indirect discrimination is generally said to arise from situations where there was no purposeful intent to discriminate, direct discrimination is considered more straightforward.

As a result of her failed appeal, Grover was ordered to pay Tickle total damages of $20,000, including an additional $10,000 awarded on appeal.

She will also have to pay Tickle’s court costs up to a maximum of $50,000 and cross-appeal costs up to a maximum of $50,000.

The court noted that Grover, and Giggle for Girls Proprietary Limited, engaged in unlawful direct discrimination against Tickle by excluding her from the app on the basis of her gender-related appearance, by refusing to restore Tickle’s access to the app, and by treating Tickle less favourably than a woman designated female at birth.

Roxanne Tickle (C) at the Federal Court of Australia in Sydney, Australia on April 9, 2024. (AAP Image/Bianca De Marchi)
Roxanne Tickle (C) at the Federal Court of Australia in Sydney, Australia on April 9, 2024. AAP Image/Bianca De Marchi

Women’s Advocates Express Concern

Women’s Forum Australia spokeswoman Stephanie Bastiaan said the outcome was a “shock to women across the country.”
“It’s important to note the court expressly said it was only applying the Sex Discrimination Act as it is written—it is ‘not empowered to give effect to its own view’ about whether that law is desirable,” she wrote on X.

Bastiaan then blamed the outcome on the former Gillard Labor government, arguing it had undermined the legal framework.

“In 2013, Julia Gillard’s Australian Labor government amended the Sex Discrimination Act—stripping the meaning out of ’man‘ and ’woman' and adding gender identity as a protected attribute to be pitted against biological sex,” she said.

“Today’s outcome is proof of what those amendments have done—women are left with no meaningful rights or recognition under the Sex Discrimination Act—a bitter irony, given that protecting women was the very purpose of the act under our commitment to CEDAW [Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women].”

In a statement on social media, One Nation Leader Pauline Hanson said she was “disgusted” by the court’s decision.

“It flies in the face of biological reality, and strips rights from women,” she said.

“Women’s spaces are not being protected and are no longer safe.

“I will back Sall Grover in parliament.”

Hanson has vowed to continue her fight to amend the Sex Discrimination Act to “reflect biological reality.”

Google LogoMark Us Preferred on Google
Crystal-Rose Jones
Crystal-Rose Jones
Author
Crystal-Rose Jones is a reporter based in Australia. She previously worked at News Corp for 16 years as a senior journalist and editor.
Author’s Selected Articles
War Memorial Responds to Criticism Over Missing Anthem During Major Opening
Jun 26, 2026
War Memorial Responds to Criticism Over Missing Anthem During Major Opening
NSW Premier Backs Migration Concerns but Heavily Criticises Hanson’s Multiculturalism Views
Jun 26, 2026
NSW Premier Backs Migration Concerns but Heavily Criticises Hanson’s Multiculturalism Views
PM Pledges ‘Strongest Possible Monitoring’ for Returning ISIS ‘Bride’
Jun 26, 2026
PM Pledges ‘Strongest Possible Monitoring’ for Returning ISIS ‘Bride’
‘Truly Independent’: TV Host Speaks After Official Dismissal for Interview With UK Influencer
Jun 25, 2026
‘Truly Independent’: TV Host Speaks After Official Dismissal for Interview With UK Influencer
AD
Add to My List
Save
The Epoch Times
Copyright © 2000 - 2026 The Epoch Times Association Inc. All Rights Reserved.