EU Warns UK on Commitments Ahead of More Brexit Trade Talks

EU Warns UK on Commitments Ahead of More Brexit Trade Talks
Britain's Prime Minister Boris Johnson chairs a Cabinet meeting of senior government ministers at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) in London, England on Sept. 1, 2020. (Toby Melville - WPA Pool / Getty Images)
The Associated Press

BRUSSELS—The European Union warned the British government on Sept. 7 that any attempt to renege on commitments made ahead of its departure from the bloc earlier this year could put at risk the hard-won peace in Northern Ireland.

The comments show growing signs that trust between the two sides is evaporating ahead of another round of Brexit trade talks on Sept. 8 in London. Britain left the bloc on Jan. 31, but the two sides are in a transition period that ends at the end of this year and are negotiating their future trade ties.

The 27-nation bloc said any attempt by Britain’s Conservative government to unilaterally ride roughshod over its divorce agreement with the EU could also jeopardize the prospects for a trade deal.

Ursula von der Leyen, president of the EU’s Executive Commission, said she expects British Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s government to implement the withdrawal agreement that paved the way for the UK’s smooth departure from the bloc. She said in a tweet that the agreement is an “obligation under international law” and a “prerequisite for any future partnership.”

She added the section in the agreement that ensures an open border between Northern Ireland, which is part of the UK, and EU member Ireland is “essential to protect peace and stability on the island.”

Her comments followed a report in the Financial Times newspaper that the British government is planning domestic legislation that would effectively override the international treaty obligations enshrined in the Brexit withdrawal agreement, particularly over issues related to the Irish border.

Johnson has said Britain could walk away from the talks within weeks, and he insists that a no-deal exit would be a “good outcome for the UK.” He said in a statement that any agreement must be sealed by an EU summit scheduled for Oct. 15.

The EU has previously said negotiations must conclude before the end of October.

Sept. 7’s developments prompted widespread selling of the British pound as traders priced in a growing likelihood that the trade talks could be heading for collapse. The pound was down 0.9 percent against both the dollar and the euro.

During this transition period, the UK remains within the EU’s economic orbit, benefiting from frictionless and tariff-free trade. But British businesses are worried about the uncertainty of what will happen to their trading ties with their biggest market beginning Jan. 1.

The EU’s chief negotiator in the talks, Michel Barnier, said Sept. 7 that he will be seeking clarification from David Frost, his counterpart in the UK, on Sept. 8 “to better understand the government’s intentions.”

“This protocol is a condition for preserving peace and for protecting the integrity of the single market,” Barnier told French radio France Inter. “It’s also a precondition for confidence between us because everything that has been signed in the past must be respected.”

Britain’s environment secretary, George Eustice, sought to downplay concerns that the government is seeking to tear up its treaty obligations. He argued that the Internal Market Bill, due to be published Sept. 9, aims to tie up some “loose ends” where there was a need for “legal certainty.”

He insisted that Johnson’s government remains committed to the principles of the deal, which will see customs checks on some goods moving from the rest of the UK to Northern Ireland.

“What we are talking about here is what type of administrative customs processes you might have for goods that might be at risk of entering the EU single market,” he told BBC radio.

James Slack, the prime minister’s spokesman, also insisted that the government remains “fully committed” to the Brexit withdrawal agreement and that this week’s legislation is intended to clear up “ambiguity” and avoid “unintended consequences” in the complex border agreement.

If the UK were to walk away from the talks, the two sides would be heading toward a no-deal outcome that would see tariffs and other impediments to trade imposed at the start of the year.

Kallum Pickering, senior economist at Berenberg Bank, said in that situation the costs would fall “disproportionately” on the UK, potentially tipping it back into recession in early 2021, while temporarily slowing the EU recovery.

“For the UK and the EU to find compromises on the sticking points, both sides must work to build trust,” he said. “The UK’s actions are doing the opposite.”

The trade discussions have made very little progress over the summer, with the two sides seemingly wide apart on several issues, notably on business regulations, the extent to which the UK can support certain industries, and over the EU’s fishing rights access to British waters.

The German government said a deal was still possible and that it’s in the interest of both sides to secure one.

“For this, Britain, in particular, needs to move on the core issues of governance, what’s summed up as ‘level playing field,’ and on the issue of fisheries,” said German government spokesman Steffen Seibert.

By Lorne Cook & Pan Pylas