This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact The Epoch Times Reprints.

The Epoch Times
The Epoch Times
AD
The Epoch Times
Australia News

Next Census to Include Gender Identity Question After Week of Pressure

The week-long debate saw the Labor Party split with its progressive electorates pushing for inclusion of gender diversity questions.
Google LogoMark Us Preferred on Google
Next Census to Include Gender Identity Question After Week of Pressure
A zebra crossing adorned with pride colours at Griffith University's Nathan Campus in Brisbane, Australia on Jan. 30, 2024. Daniel Teng/The Epoch Times
Monica O’Shea
Monica O’Shea
8/29/2024|Updated: 9/4/2024

A row over questions on gender identity in the next Census has compelled the Australian Bureau of Statistics to include questions on sexual preference.

The move comes after progressive leaders, bodies, and media outlets pushed the issue over the past week.

On Aug. 30, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the relevant questions were now being developed.

“They’re going to test for a new question, one question about sexuality, sexual preference,” he told ABC Radio.

“They'll be testing, making sure as well that people will have the option of not answering it.”

Progressive Pressure Forces Government Hand

The issue initially saw Labor MPs split on whether to oblige calls for a question on identity.

Victorian members were vocal in their support.

Related Stories
The Epoch Times
Some Loopholes in Australia’s ‘Gender Pay Gap’ Report
The Epoch Times
Australia Publishes ‘Gender Pay Gap’ Data of 5,000 Public and Private Companies
“I am proud to represent our LGBTIQA+ community. They count and should be counted. The census is an important tool to feed into government decision-making and the delivery of services,” he said federal Labor Member for Macnamara Josh Burns.

Burns narrowly edged out the Greens at the 2022 election, and represents suburbs like St Kilda and Port Melbourne in inner-city Melbourne.

Federal Labor Member for Wills Peter Khalil, who represents an area in Melbourne’s inner north, also called for questions regarding sexuality and gender identity to be included.

“I have been making my views, and those of the LGBTIQA+ community in my electorate, known to our leadership,” he said.

Meanwhile, state Victorian Labor Minister for Equality Harriet Shing, an openly lesbian MP from Labor’s left faction, also called for federal Labor to reconsider.

“I seek review and consideration of the impact of this decision on our diverse LGBTIQA+ communities and welcome the opportunity for ongoing collaboration on this matter,” she said.

Opposition Raises Concerns About ‘Woke Agenda’

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton supported federal Labor’s Census questions and raised concerns about the “woke agenda.”

“I think the set of questions that we’ve got at the moment, the long-term way in which we’ve collected this data, has stood us well as a country,” he said.

“If you’ve got the woke agenda, which I think is at odds with the vast majority of Australians, then the prime minister should argue that case, but I think we’re pretty happy with the settings that we’ve got in place at the moment.”

Equality Australia opposed the federal government’s decision not to include LGBT.
“We deserve to be counted in the census. The idea that counting LGBTIQ people is divisive is deeply offensive and wrong,” they said.

The Census and LGBTs

The Australian Bureau of Statistics had earlier said the next Census would remain unchanged.
“This decision means that there will be no new topics introduced for the 2026 census and no existing topics removed,” the ABS said.

Yet the ABS had previously issued a statement on the lack of gender diversity questions. The 2021 Census only included a question about sex, which the bureau said was distinct from a person’s gender.

“The ABS is aware that for some respondents, the absence of questions on their gender identity, variations of sex characteristics or sexual orientation meant that they felt invisible and excluded when completing the Census and in the Census results produced,” the statement at the time said.

“Teal” MP Allegra Spender, who represents Sydney’s eastern suburbs, earlier called the decision not to include the options for gender “disgraceful.”

She was one of multiple cross-bench parliamentarians who wrote to the prime minister.

“We are writing to urge the government to reverse its decision to exclude LGBTIQA+ people from the 2026 census,” the letter said.

In this letter, the parliamentarians drew attention to the ABS statement in 2023, which they said led them to believe that LGBTs “would finally be recognised in the 2026 Census.”

Meanwhile, the Greens said Labor had betrayed LGBT peoples.

“Including questions about sexual orientation, gender identity and intersex characteristics in the Census,” the Greens said.
Google LogoMark Us Preferred on Google
Monica O’Shea
Monica O’Shea
Author
Monica O’Shea is a reporter based in Australia. She previously worked as a reporter for Motley Fool Australia, Daily Mail Australia, and Fairfax Regional Media. She can be reached at monica.o'[email protected]
Author’s Selected Articles
One Nation Abortion Bill Defeated in SA Lower House
Jun 19, 2026
One Nation Abortion Bill Defeated in SA Lower House
Victorian Labor Introduces Bill to Lock in Work From Home 2 Days a Week
Jun 16, 2026
Victorian Labor Introduces Bill to Lock in Work From Home 2 Days a Week
Victoria Tops Australia for Car Theft Claims With $243 Million in Losses
Jun 05, 2026
Victoria Tops Australia for Car Theft Claims With $243 Million in Losses
South Australia’s Debt to Surpass $53 Billion by 2030 as Hiring Freeze Announced
Jun 04, 2026
South Australia’s Debt to Surpass $53 Billion by 2030 as Hiring Freeze Announced
Related Topics
labor
gender
identity
census
Peter Dutton
Jim Chalmers
Richard Marles
sexuality
Allegra Spender
Josh Burns
LGBTIQA+
AD
Add to My List
Save
The Epoch Times
Copyright © 2000 - 2026 The Epoch Times Association Inc. All Rights Reserved.