A Canadian Jewish organization is calling for more government protection after the Oct. 2 terrorist attack on a synagogue in the UK.
“Our hearts are with the families of the victims, and we pray for the full recovery of the injured,” CIJA said in the post.
It has called on all leaders, including Prime Minister Mark Carney, to improve security for the Jewish community.
“From Ottawa and Montreal to Manchester and Washington, anti-Israel and antisemitic radicalization is fueling violence against citizens of our countries. We urgently call on leaders at all levels — including Prime Minister Carney — to strengthen security at Jewish institutions and ensure that those who incite or commit violence against Canadians are held fully accountable.”
The attack took place on Yom Kippur, the holiest day in the Jewish calendar, when worshippers traditionally spend the day fasting and in prayer.
UK police said the attacker, Jihad Al Shamie, was a British national of Syrian origin.
Carney called the attack an “appalling antisemitic atrocity.”
Conservatives say the government should be protecting the Jewish people more effectively.
“I call on the Prime Minister to ensure there are serious consequences for those who commit or incite antisemitic crimes — including stronger hate-crime laws, and the deportation of non-Canadians who come here to spread hatred.”
Law enforcement agencies across Canada increased patrols near Jewish institutions while people gathered to observe Yom Kippur.
Incidents have included firebombs at synagogues, and gunshots fired on multiple occasions at a Toronto Jewish school.
The Conservatives have raised concerns, saying the bill would remove the requirement for attorney general consent before laying hate crime charges. They say that provision is a safeguard that prevents hate speech laws from being used as a political weapon by the government of the day.
“[Attorney general consent] provides that sober second thought to make sure that this does indeed reach the bar of a hate crime,” Conservative MP Brad Redekopp said during the bill’s second reading in the House of Commons on Oct. 1. “Removing the requirement for the attorney general is maybe not the best idea.”







