Australian Minister Makes Urgent Dash to Solomons Over Chinese Security Deal

The streets of downtown Honiara, the capital of the Solomon Islands, on Dec. 6, 2021. (Mavis Podokolo/AFP via Getty Images)

Australia’s pacific minister has briefly dropped election campaigning to fly to the Solomon Islands amid anxiety over an impending security deal with the Beijing regime and the recent leak of a Chinese request to import arms into the region.

Minister Zed Seselja is due for talks with Solomon Islands officials on April 13 in the capital Honiara and is due to return the same day.

“My discussions will include the proposed Solomon Islands-China security agreement,” Seselja said in a statement obtained by AAP.

“We respect the right of Solomon Islands to make sovereign decisions about its national security,” he added. “Our view remains that the Pacific family will continue to meet the security needs of our region.”

Director Maori Policy Unit of New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Martin Wikaira (R), accompanies Minister for International Development and the Pacific Zed Seselja and Australian Foreign Minister Marise Payne during a Mihi Whakatau at New Zealand's Parliament in Wellington on April 22, 2021. (Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

Just a few days earlier, details of a request from the Solomon Islands’ Chinese Embassy to Beijing emerged including a request to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) for “light weapons and equipment” including two machine guns, one sniper rifle, 10 pistols, 10 rifles, and “police equipment” including 10 electric batons.

The PRC was also set to send 10 plainclothes security officers for a period of six to 12 months, according to the documents dated Dec. 3, 2021, in response to riots that saw the Chinatown district in Honiara burned down and resulted in three deaths.

The riots have been blamed on ongoing dissatisfaction with the performance of incumbent Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare, as well as his links to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)—which have seen allegations of blatant bribery of pro-CCP politicians emerge.

Also in the mix is a contentious security agreement that would allow the CCP to dispatch forces to “protect the safety of Chinese personnel and major projects in the Solomon Islands.”

Chinese and Solomon Island leaders have denied that the agreement could open the door toward eventual militarisation in the region, with Prime Minister Sogavare saying it “would not be in the interest of Solomon Islands to host any naval or military base of any country.”

Police stand guard outside parliament in Honiara, Solomon Islands on Dec. 6, 2021 (Mavis Podokolo/AFP via Getty Images)

Yet documents on April 7 appear to show that Beijing has been scouting the region for military projects for years.

News of the security pact has sparked a flurry of diplomatic activity, with top U.S. diplomat Kurt Campbell set to visit the Solomon Islands along with Daniel Kritenbrink, assistant secretary of the Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, according to the Financial Times.

Australia has already sent heads of two major intelligence agencies to meet with the Solomon Islands’ prime minister—Andrew Shearer, director-general of the Office of National Intelligence, and Paul Symon, director-general of the Australian Secret Intelligence Service.

On April 12, federal opposition leader Anthony Albanese blamed the governing centre-right Coalition for dropping the ball in the South Pacific and questioned why a minister had not already been sent.

“Australia needs to step up. Not just in a title, we need to step up in reality and develop those relationships with the Solomons and other nations in the Indo-Pacific,” he told reporters in Tasmania.

Albanese has also blamed the federal government for not doing more on climate change.

“If you go to the Pacific if you meet with leaders in the Pacific, the first thing they raise with you is not aid, it is climate change,” he said in late March.

However, Cleo Paskal, an associate fellow of the Asia-Pacific Programme at the London-based Chatham House, said the Australian government should instead focus on reinvigorating the democratic process in the country and pressure Sogavare to abide by the 2000 Townsville Peace Agreement—which ended violence in the country and laid the groundwork for democratic government.

“Put out the steps that the various provinces, including Malaita [Province], agreed to. There’s a whole series of things that have already been negotiated—everybody signed on, including the government under Sogavare,” she previously told The Epoch Times.

“Sogavare and his members of Parliament are given a choice, ‘You can deal with China, or you can deal with the rest of the world,’” Paskal said, noting that Sogavare and his Cabinet could lose privileges afforded to them in their relationship with Australia.

Paskal said the pressure could compel Sogavare’s ministers to intervene and stop things from “going too far.”