Aussie Pension Funds Invest $1 Billion in China Tech Firms Accused of Human Rights Violations

Aussie Pension Funds Invest $1 Billion in China Tech Firms Accused of Human Rights Violations
Chinese flags on barbed wire wall in Kashgar, Xinjiang, China. (Jonathan Densford/Adobe Stock)
Daniel Khmelev
9/24/2021
Updated:
9/24/2021

A human rights organisation has revealed that Australia’s largest super funds have invested over $1 billion (US$729 million) of Aussies retirement savings into China-based tech companies accused of aiding the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) persecution of Uyghurs and other minority groups.

Hong Kong Watch (HKW) has urged AustralianSuper and the state-owned Commonwealth Superannuation to divest its funding after releasing a report that found a combined $1,095 billion (US$800 million) has been invested into major Chinese companies Alibaba and Tencent.
It is alleged that Alibaba has offered customers ethnicity recognition software capable of identifying Uyghurs.

HKW also raised concern about Alibaba’s social credit application, Sesame Credit, which “may be absorbed into the Chinese state’s dystopian social credit system.”

The report further noted that Tencent’s WeChat, China’s most significant multi-purpose social media and payment app, had been accused by Humans Rights Watch of censorship and surveillance under the directive of the CCP.

People walk past a Wechat Pay sign at the Tencent company headquarters in Shenzhen, Guangdong province, China, on Aug. 7, 2020. (Reuters/David Kirton)
People walk past a Wechat Pay sign at the Tencent company headquarters in Shenzhen, Guangdong province, China, on Aug. 7, 2020. (Reuters/David Kirton)
In 2020, AustralianSuper also invested $3.2 million into Hikvision, a Chinese state-owned video surveillance manufacturer that had allegedly marketed an AI camera that identified Uyghurs before removing it from their website.

Dennis Kwok, an exiled Hong Kong lawmaker who focused on Asia’s human rights issues while on the Legislative Council between 2012-2020, said Western nations had an obligation not to support governments’ engaging in human rights violations.

“As authoritarian governments around the world crackdown on democracy and freedom, businesses should not play a complicit role, particularly if they are major beneficiaries from open societies and the rule of law back home,” Kwok said.

The report highlighted a new global trend of environmental, social and governance considerations, with firms valuing their investments’ social and ecological impacts alongside returns on investment.

However, the report said the same concern was absent when addressing human rights abuses, particularly in China, given the CCP’s persecution of Falun Gong practitioners, Uyghurs, and Tibetans, as well as the attack on Hong Kong’s democratic freedom.

Communities of Tibetan, Uyghur, Hong Kong, Chinese, etc., call for boycotting Beijing's 2022 Winter Olympics in Melbourne, Australia, on June 23, 2021. (The Epoch Times)
Communities of Tibetan, Uyghur, Hong Kong, Chinese, etc., call for boycotting Beijing's 2022 Winter Olympics in Melbourne, Australia, on June 23, 2021. (The Epoch Times)
This comes as the Financial Times estimated that global holdings of Chinese stocks and bonds surged roughly 40 percent to more than US$800 billion in 2021.

Policy Director of Hong Kong Watch, Johnny Patterson, said that while many investors were choosing to inject billions into countries—such as China—with the goal of pursuing profit, many citizens and members of government remained utterly unaware.

“There is a clear knowledge gap between financial professionals who know that enormous amounts of the money of ordinary people, institutional investment, pensions and government funding is being invested in China, and the members of the public, media and policymakers who would have serious ethical and practical reservations about what seems to be a reckless and problematic course of action,” Patterson said.

“This information gap has provided cover for financial institutions to pursue profit without regard for the social impacts of their ties with firms that are closely affiliated with egregious rights abuses in Hong Kong or Xinjiang.”