Asylum Health-Care Program Expected to Cost More Than $1.5B per Year: Budget Watchdog

Asylum Health-Care Program Expected to Cost More Than $1.5B per Year: Budget Watchdog
Jason Jacques, interim parliamentary budget officer, prepares to appear before the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Sept. 25, 2025. The Canadian Press/Justin Tang
|Updated:
0:00

Canada’s parliamentary budget officer says the federal health-care program used by asylum claimants will cost more than $1.5 billion annually within the next five years.

Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO) Jason Jacques estimated in a Feb. 12 report that the total cost of the Interim Federal Health Program (IFHP) will reach nearly $1 billion this fiscal year and increase to more than $1.5 billion by fiscal 2029-30.
The PBO compiled the report in response to an audit request by the health committee, which is studying the impact of immigration policy on health care. The committee asked the PBO to conduct a fiscal analysis of program to “project future expenses and assess the drivers behind recent significant cost and usage increases.”
The IFHP provides temporary health care coverage to “some groups of foreign nationals who are vulnerable and disadvantaged, and aren’t eligible for provincial or territorial health insurance,” Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) says.

The program provides coverage to resettled refugees, refugee claimants, protected persons, foreign nationals detained under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, victims of human trafficking, and “other identified groups where the Minister has granted coverage,” according to IRCC.

The program covers medical services such as hospital, ambulance, and lab services, psychologists, physiotherapists, speech language therapists, prosthetics, mobility aids, hearing aids, home care, long-term care, urgent dental care, limited vision care, and prescription drugs, the department says, adding that it covers the cost of “most medical care” for recipients until they are eligible for provincial or territorial health insurance.

The PBO said the program’s cost increased from $211 million to $896 million between fiscal 2020-21 and fiscal 2024-25, representing an average growth rate of 33.7 percent. However, the average growth rate is expected to drop to 11.2 percent over the next five years.

“This slower growth reflects both a moderated increase in the number of beneficiaries and a more gradual rise in average annual costs,” the PBO wrote in the report.

The PBO said the number of beneficiaries has increased “considerably” in recent years, with a growing number of asylum claims and longer durations of eligibility due to processing delays.

“It’s clear and it’s evident that the costs for this program are growing very quickly and growing more quickly than overall federal spending,” Jacques said while appearing before the House of Commons health committee on Feb. 12.
The IRCC says IFHP costs are driven by the volume of asylum claimants in Canada each year, and by the accumulation of past asylum claimants who are waiting for a decision on their claim or removal from Canada.

IRCC says the program is needed to bridge gaps in health coverage for refugees, asylum claimants, and other “uniquely vulnerable” foreign nationals by providing coverage while their claims are being adjudicated, until they become eligible for provincial or territorial health insurance, or depart Canada.

While the intake of asylum claims has moderated over the past year, it remained above processing and determination capacity, the PBO report said, adding that the projection in the report is based on the assumption that intake, as well as processing and determination capacity, will remain close to current levels.

The PBO estimated that the annual cost per IFHP beneficiary will grow from $1,363 in its fiscal 2024-25 to $2,148 by fiscal 2029-30.

Rejected Asylum Claims

The Conservatives have raised concerns about the program providing coverage to migrants who have had their asylum claims rejected.

“According to the government’s website, refugee claimants remain eligible for supplemental health benefits through this program until they leave Canada,” Conservative MP Dan Mazier said at the Feb. 12 committee meeting. “So what happens if they don’t leave Canada?”

PBO adviser-analyst Caroline Nicol told MPs that based on the information IRCC has provided the PBO, even if a refugee’s claim is rejected, their coverage only ends when the individual leaves the country.

Tory MPs also asked whether an individual facing terrorism charges, or an individual who has been ordered deported but doesn’t show up for the deportation and remains in Canada, would still be covered under the IFHP.

Nicol reiterated that according to the IRCC’s guidance, an individual’s coverage only ends when they leave Canada, even if they have been ordered to be deported or are facing charges.

The PBO report noted Budget 2025 indicated a “modest co-payment model” will be introduced to the IFHP for supplemental health products or services, and these changes to the program are not reflected in the projection as the co-payment information was only released by the government in January.

“Including this new measure would reduce our estimate of the total cost for the IFHP program,” the report said.

Liberal MP Doug Eyolfson said during the committee meeting the co-payments are estimated to save between $127 million and $232 million per year.

When announcing the co-payments measure on Jan. 27, IRCC said the co-payments will “help keep supplemental health care accessible for eligible beneficiaries while responsibly managing growing demand,” and supports the long-term sustainability of the program.

IFHP beneficiaries will be responsible for paying $4 for each eligible prescription medication filled or refilled under the program, and 30 percent of the cost of all other eligible supplemental health services, such as dental care, vision care, counselling, and assistive devices.

Jacques told MPs his projection also doesn’t account for measures to tighten immigration under Bill C-12, which is still under consideration before the Senate and has not yet received royal assent. He said his office would be “very happy to extend the analysis” to incorporate the co-payment model and the changes under Bill C-12.

Liberal MPs said during the meeting that the PBO’s report is “based on old data” since it doesn’t include this information. Liberal MP Maggie Chi said the projection numbers should therefore be “taken with a grain of salt.”