The opposition continues to challenge Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to call out a senior Labor figure for shaking hands and being part of a photo-op with authoritarian leaders during Beijing’s military parade.
Opposition Leader Sussan Ley drew attention to the close friendship between Andrews and Albanese, during an interview with Sky News Australia.
“I know that the prime minister and Daniel Andrews have been close. They worked together on a strategy leading into the election campaign,” she said.
The parade cost an estimated US$5 billion and was also attended by the leaders of of Iran, Myanmar, Indonesia, Cambodia, and Vietnam.
When asked if Andrews’ actions were “treachery,” Ley said, “Some would call it that.”
“We need to have a statement of moral clarity from the prime minister, that to see his great friend be so close to dictators and despots at an event hosted by the Chinese Communist Party, which is a military show of strength to the west. That does need comment from our prime minister,” Ley said.
Albanese and Andrews both hail from the left faction of the Labor Party and were seen dining together at a luxury Melbourne restaurant in June before the G7 summit in Canada.
While Alex Hawke, the Liberal Party’s Manager of Opposition Business in the House said the country’s leaders needed to support democracy and not authoritarianism.
Albanese Refrains from Condemning Former Premier
Meanwhile, Albanese has distanced the federal government from Andrews’ actions in two consecutive Question Times.In a separate question the prime minister was asked by the MP for Herbert, Phillip Thompson, “Is the prime minister aware that Daniel Andrews has not disclosed his engagement on the Australian government’s Foreign Influence Transparency scheme?”
Albanese responded, “Everyone should comply with the law. Simple as that.”
On Sept. 3, Albanese was asked a similar question and pointed to the Coalition’s track record.
Albanese also made clear Andrews was no longer an MP and was acting in his own private capacity.
“I’m responsible for the Australian government, the Australian government did have a representative there, and the Australian government did have a representative 10 years ago. That was a minister in the government. Our government chose that that would not be the case,” he said.







