These are boom times for the vineyards of Chile. The latest figures from the International Organization of Vine and Wine reveal a record year for the South American nation, with wine production up 23 percent.
Chilean wine has long been considered good value for money, a reliable, inexpensive, and safe everyday option. But there’s far more to it than budget Sauvignon Blancs; you can also find wines of far superior quality. Jane MacQuitty, in her weekly wine page in The Times (of London), for example, has just recommended the 2012 Montes Purple Angel carmenere, which retails for about $46 (keep it for five years before drinking).
Wine Spectator, the top wine magazine in the United States, meanwhile, made Lapostolle Clos Apalta 2005 its Wine of the Year in 2008. The price of Clos Apalta depends on the harvest year, but starts at around $62. Wine Spectator also tends to include Concha y Toro’s Don Melchor among the top ten wines in the world. Don’t ask the price: the best harvests are simply unavailable.
A Land of Plenty
A combination of reasons explains the successful growth of the Chilean wine industry. Geographical diversity helps. The first good Chilean wines were made in the fertile valleys in the country’s center. But more recently it has been found that many wines improve when the vineyards are close to the Pacific Ocean, for example, or at high altitude in the Andes, or up the hillsides instead of down at the valley bottom, or in particular types of soil. There are a lot of variables.
Old wine areas, abandoned for decades or even centuries, have been rediscovered, and completely new areas identified. New grape varieties are tested and new technologies developed or invested in.
Favourable politics and economics have helped, too. Macroeconomic conditions in Chile have been stable for a long time. There is no inflation and little corruption. Foreign investment is welcome too—an opportunity embraced by winemakers and entrepreneurs from Spain (including Miguel Torres, pioneer of Chilean wine modernization since the 1970s), France, California, Italy, Portugal, Norway, and Switzerland, to name a few.
Some foreigners have made important contributions, such as the rediscovery of carmenere, an old Bordeaux grape variety believed extinct, or the re-invention and valorization of pais, a previously low-prestige grape variety first brought to Chile in the sixteenth century. In many cases, these foreign links were essential to start exports.
But it would be wrong to forget the contributions to Chilean wine success by Chilean winemakers and entrepreneurs. Chilean wine is not a foreign-only, or even foreign-mostly, activity. Exports were pioneered in the 1980s by Aurelio Montes. The largest wine exporter, Concha y Toro, is Chilean-owned and -staffed. The company is admired worldwide for its consistently high quality (including but not limited to Don Melchor), entrepreneurial flair, its wide range of products, an ever present sales force (they export to over 130 countries) and dynamic marketing, including their mid-price brand Casillero del Diablo’s sponsorship of Manchester United.
There are also important scale economies in international distribution. The large wineries engage in aggressive marketing and pricing with supermarket chains and distribution firms.
Small Producers and Knowledge Workers
Supply is characterized by diversity and heterogeneity. Some very successful, internationally-respected Chilean wines are made by innovative firms which are often little more than one-man (or one-woman) operations. For example, the Vigno group makes carignan only, under very specific requirements, in the Maule region. Sometimes small producers benefit from positive knock-on effects generated by the large exporters.
There are now in Chile several hundred highly-qualified local winemakers, a critical mass of knowledge workers without whom there would have been no Chilean wine “miracle.” These experts regularly exchange knowledge with each other, not only with local neighbors in their respective geographical clusters, but also in a lively national knowledge network of conferences, tastings, and competitions.
Many of them have international experience or are active internationally. Maule academic researchers, with prominent participation from Vigno and other local producers, hosted the annual conference of the European Association of Wine Economists in Talca in 2013.
…and the Moral Is?
In some cases, wine tourism offered the possibility of long distance relationship marketing. Some Chilean wineries have done well repeatedly in prestigious international competitions, or responded quickly and effectively to ever increasing demand for organic wines. Crucially, Chilean wine success did not result from deliberate government planning.
Of course, not even Chilean wine is perfectly free of dangers and risks. The new knowledge workers and some traditional owners do not always agree, and principal-agent conflicts have emerged in the past. Chile is prone to both earthquakes and challenges to the current free-market political economy model. Then there is global warming, which may eventually force wineries to move plantations many miles to the south of the country, with uncertain results. And there is no limit to how much competition may appear: there are many good places to make excellent wines around the world, and people everywhere are learning how to do it.
But clearly the Chilean wine experience offers some useful pointers to other developing nations. Its success suggests that primary commodity exporting does not need to be an eternal curse, especially with sound macro and microeconomic policies, and under positive political and economic conditions.
David Hojman is a professor of economics and international business at the University of Liverpool, U.K. This article was previously published on TheConversation.com
Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.