Who’s Too Old to Be President?

Who’s Too Old to Be President?
Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley arrives on stage at her first campaign event in Charleston, S.C., on Feb. 15, 2023. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Roger L. Simon
2/17/2023
Updated:
2/20/2023
0:00
Commentary

During the first big interview of her presidential run, Nikki Haley had no response when asked by Sean Hannity how she differed from former President Donald Trump in even one area of policy.

It was an unimpressive performance, considering how long the former South Carolina governor and U.N. ambassador must have been mulling over her White House ambitions.

Nevertheless, the 51-year-old Haley did come up with one, if self-serving, semi-original proposal.

The candidate—who takes every opportunity to characterize herself as somehow “new” or “next generation”—thinks that anyone older than 75 competing for the presidency should be required to undergo a mental competency test.

I could take this personally, since I’m older than her chosen number—to be clear: If nominated, I won’t run; if elected, I won’t serve—but it’s probably a good idea.

In this instance, the specific individual she had in mind is rather obvious, since Trump has already taken such a test and passed.

President Joe Biden hasn’t taken any kind of cognitive test recently, to the public’s knowledge, anyway. We can assume that if he had and had done well, we would have heard about it, no doubt ad infinitum from the usual media suspects.

(Literally, as I was writing, the results of the president’s annual checkup were being released, again without such a test. His halting speech was ascribed to “reflux.”)

Trump is able to speak in public for hours, going on and off teleprompter at will. Biden can barely handle a minute or two of impromptu questioning before becoming incoherent or fleeing. Reading from a teleprompter can also be a chore.

The more disturbing question is, are the voters themselves interested in the mental competence of their political leaders?

Maybe. Maybe not. Polling is showing that many or even a majority of Democrats aren’t too happy with Biden and would prefer that he be replaced as their candidate for 2024. But what’s the real reason for this?

If we’re to judge from the sad personal story of John Fetterman—who has, not surprisingly, been hospitalized for depression after only weeks in the Senate—voters don’t care a whit about mental competency. Fetterman was a stroke victim and sounded like one throughout his campaign, on the rare occasions that he said anything.

No honest person could possibly have thought that he was fit for office. In fact, his candidacy had more than a whiff of sadism about it, with party leaders and even family encouraging such a challenged person to do something they never should have. What do they think now that he’s in the hospital?

I hesitate to write this, but the same can be said of those who pushed Biden into the presidency. We’ve all witnessed the lost president being led around by his wife.

Nevertheless for the Democrats, at least, party affiliation is everything. I suspect it’s also true for Republicans, as the George Santos case would indicate; but Santos’s duplicities were barely known during his campaign compared to Fetterman’s health and psychological problems that were well publicized.

But back to the question of mental competency tests. It’s well known that humans vary tremendously as they age. Sophocles is said to have written the masterpiece “Oedipus at Colonus” at age 90. Marc Chagall became the first living artist to be exhibited at the Louvre at the same age. A man named Teiichi Igarashi climbed Mt. Fuji at 99.

On the other hand, I witnessed the mind of my truly brilliant friend—the multiple award-winning author Ross MacDonald (Kenneth Millar)—completely disappear through Alzheimer’s to the extent that he couldn’t recognize even his wife in his 50s. Ronald Reagan, as we know, increasingly had problems toward the end of his life.

That’s why the mental competency of our presidents and presidential candidates should be continually monitored, and 75 is as good a year as any to start. (I see that CNN’s Don Lemon disagrees, which makes it all the more necessary.) It should be done at least every other year because ... things happen.

At this moment, many of us suspect that Biden isn’t, as they say, really calling the shots. And yet he was the one who was elected by the people (or may have been—that’s another discussion). Unelected—or once elected—people could well be running the show. That’s not how it’s supposed to work in a constitutional republic or any form of democratic or republican government, for that matter—for good reason.

This is especially true now with the most unelected people of all—our secretive intelligence agencies and their allies—watching us, increasingly in control of our lives. More than ever, we need elected leaders with their faculties intact to confront them.

As for Trump—should he, as seems likely, be nominated by his party again—he too should be tested once more, although I strongly suspect, if my inbox is any indication, that he would pass with the proverbial flying colors.

Many of us get nonstop emails from him multiple times per day with various statements that he makes on the issues and citations of articles he has liked. The man is a workhorse.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Prize-winning author and Oscar-nominated screenwriter Roger L. Simon’s latest of many books is “American Refugees: The Untold Story of the Mass Exodus from Blue States to Red States.” He is banned on X, but you can subscribe to his newsletter here.
truth
Related Topics