I’ve noted that since Joe Biden has been officially named president-elect, the mainstream media has been asking questions about Hunter Biden’s pay-for-play and money-laundering schemes. Based on Joe Biden’s alleged involvement, this brings into question whether the Dems really vetted their president-elect. We all recall that prior to the 2016 election, the Dems were initiating procedures to impeach President-elect Donald Trump—should we start impeachment proceedings based on President-elect Biden’s involvement in his son’s schemes for personal gain?
Remember, when President Gerald R. Ford was a representative in the U.S. House, he defined impeachable offenses to include (with Alexander Hamilton’s requirements for impeachment contained in the Federalist Papers) “whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history including 1) exceeding the constitutional bounds of the power of the office; 2) behavior grossly incompatible with the proper function and purpose of the office, and 3) employing the power of the office for an improper purpose, OR FOR PERSONAL GAIN.” (emphasis added)
The above conclusion is drawn by me, and probably at least half of our country’s citizens, is based on Tony Bobulinski’s testimony, the NY Post’s article, emails, and other published evidence contained in Hunter Biden’s laptop computer, and reporting by The Epoch Times and Fox News.