Witnesses Debate Federal Campaign Law Implications of Trump’s Conviction in House Hearing

Sharply divergent views of federal election campaign law and the legitimacy of former President Trump’s May 30 conviction emerge at a hearing on Capitol Hill
Witnesses Debate Federal Campaign Law Implications of Trump’s Conviction in House Hearing
Former President Donald Trump (C) sits in the courtroom with attorneys Todd Blanche (L) and Emil Bove at Manhattan Criminal Court in New York City on May 14, 2024. Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images
Michael Washburn
Updated:
0:00

Witnesses called to testify before a GOP-led House committee on June 13 offered starkly divergent views of the validity of using federal campaign law in the New York prosecution of former President Donald Trump.

Former Federal Election Commission (FEC) Chair James Trainor testified at a House Judiciary Committee hearing that Manhatten District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s case against former President Trump drew on an unusual interpretation of the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA)—one that sets the bar for violations so low that it might well set a precedent for any number of politically motivated prosecutions.

Michael Washburn
Michael Washburn
Reporter
Michael Washburn is a New York-based reporter who covers U.S. and China-related topics for The Epoch Times. He has a background in legal and financial journalism, and also writes about arts and culture. Additionally, he is the host of the weekly podcast Reading the Globe. His books include “The Uprooted and Other Stories,” “When We're Grownups,” and “Stranger, Stranger.”
Related Topics