Wisconsin Judge Rules Mail-In Ballots With Certain Errors Must Still Be Counted

A Wisconsin judge ruled that absentee ballots that have missing portions of witness addresses must be counted.
Wisconsin Judge Rules Mail-In Ballots With Certain Errors Must Still Be Counted
An official is seen collecting the count from absentee ballots from a voting machine in Milwaukee on Nov. 4, 2020. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)
Jack Phillips
1/3/2024
Updated:
1/3/2024
0:00

A judge in Wisconsin on Jan. 2 ruled that state election clerks can accept absentee ballots that contain errors, including missing portions of witness addresses.

The Dane County Circuit Court judge ruled in favor of the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin in its lawsuit to clarify voting protections for voters whose absentee ballots have minor errors in listing their witnesses’ addresses.

The ruling means that absentee ballots with certain technical witness address defects won’t be rejected in future elections, the league said in a statement.

In the order, Dane County Circuit Court Judge Ryan Nilsestuen wrote that the “witness address requirement is material to whether a voter is qualified,” noting that “rejecting ballots for trivial mistakes in the Witness Address requirement directly violates the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964.”

The judge wrote that the Constitution of Wisconsin and state statutes indicate that a person can vote if they’re a U.S. citizen aged 18 or older, have resided in the election district for 28 days before an election, and aren’t a convicted felon.

“By contrast, and as should be clear by now, an absentee ballot cannot be rejected for trivial defects, such as a missing ZIP code for the witness’s address,” the judge’s order reads. “After all, a witness’s address says nothing about the voter’s citizenship, age, or residency. Nor does it say anything about whether the voter has been disenfranchised due to a felony conviction or adjudicated incompetent to vote. The address is simply not material to determining the eligibility of a voter.”

Judge Nilsestuen had previously served as chief legal counsel to Democrat Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers’s office. Mr. Evers named him to the post in December 2022 after another judge retired, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported.

“Election clerks are not automatons, and it is exceedingly difficult, if not impossible, to remove all subjectivity from a process requiring thousands of election workers to review hundreds of thousands of ballots. For better or worse, our elections are administered by humans and, as such, there will always be some level of subjectivity in administering election statutes. This does not make such statutes unconstitutional or unworkable,” the judge wrote.

The lawsuit filed by the League of Women Voters, a left-leaning organization based in Washington, argued that rejecting absentee ballots for the omission of certain witness address components violated the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which prohibits denying the right to vote based on an error that has no material bearing on determining voting eligibility.

“All voters deserve to have their votes counted regardless of whether they vote in person or absentee,” Debra Cronmiller, executive director of the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin, said in a statement after the ruling was handed down.

“Small errors or omissions on the absentee certificate envelope should not prevent voters from exercising their constitutional rights.”

The Wisconsin Elections Commission and clerks in Green Bay, Racine, and Madison were named as defendants in the lawsuit. The Republican-led Assembly and Senate also joined the case and sought to have the suit dismissed.

After Republicans intervened in the lawsuit, the Republican National Committee and the state GOP in August described the legal challenge as a Democrat attempt to undermine state elections.

“Despite the schemes of overtly far-left groups like Law Forward and the Elias Group, the Republican Party of Wisconsin will continue to ensure Wisconsin voters have full confidence in our elections,” Republican Party of Wisconsin Chairman Brian Schimming said in a statement at the time.

“While Democrats attempt to undo common sense voting measures like requiring witness signatures on absentee ballots, we will continue to fight back against Democrat efforts to undermine safeguards every step of the way.

“Having safeguards in our elections should be a bipartisan issue; Wisconsinites in every corner of the state want fair and transparent elections.”

It’s part of a “kind of very aggressive attempt to undermine what are some really basic, boring rules,” RNC Legal Communications Director Gates McGavick told Spectrum News 1.

“This is kind of the minutia of how elections are run, so when we see Democrats put millions of dollars into these very convoluted suits, trying to rewrite the rule book, you kind of have to take a step back—why are they doing that, and how can we stop them?”

Previously, the elections commission stated in late 2022 that an absentee ballot “address” must include the street name, number, and municipality, the Journal Sentinel reported.

A judge in 2022 also ruled that election commission guidance allowing election clerks to fill in missing information on a witness certification for absentee ballots was illegal and must be rescinded.

In a separate case, Waukesha County Circuit Court Judge Brad Schimel in November barred voters from spoiling an absentee ballot, preventing voters from canceling a mail-in ballot that they have already returned to cast a new one.
The Associated Press contributed to this report
Jack Phillips is a breaking news reporter with 15 years experience who started as a local New York City reporter. Having joined The Epoch Times' news team in 2009, Jack was born and raised near Modesto in California's Central Valley. Follow him on X: https://twitter.com/jackphillips5
twitter
Related Topics