Among the terminated contracts was a $4.3 million IT services contract for “Inflation Reduction Act transformation project management support” at the IRS, a $661,000 Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) IT services contract for “social media monitoring platform subscription,” and a $191,000 U.S. Agency for Global Media contract for “broadcast operations and maintenance in Ethiopia, Africa.”
The savings were achieved through measures such as asset sales, interest savings, workforce reductions, regulatory savings, deletion of fraud and improper payments, and cancellation or renegotiation of contracts/leases.
The HHS ranked at the top of agencies with the most savings under DOGE, followed by the General Services Administration, the Social Security Administration (SSA), the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), and the Small Business Administration.
Democrats have raised questions about privacy protections when DOGE staff access the personal information of Americans.
DOGE staff’s reported actions appear to violate the Privacy Act of 1974 and the E-Government Act of 2002, which relates to protecting Americans’ personal data, the report said.
“DOGE isn’t making government more efficient—it’s putting Americans’ sensitive information in the hands of completely unqualified and untrustworthy individuals,” Peters said.
“They are bypassing cybersecurity protections, evading oversight, and putting Americans’ personal data at risk. We cannot allow this shadow operation to continue operating unchecked while millions of people face the threat of identity theft, economic disruption, and permanent harm.”
The second order formally blocked an order from lower courts that demanded DOGE respond to freedom of information requests in a pending complaint.
It cited a $2.8 million grant from the National Science Foundation that was issued for addressing “historic and systemic racial inequities” in STEM education.
A $6.9 million grant was issued by the Department of Education for teaching social and emotional learning and the foundations of mental health development from an “antiracist approach.”






