Trump to Seek Supreme Court Vote to Revive Case Against Hillary Clinton

Two lower courts ruled against the president in the case.
Trump to Seek Supreme Court Vote to Revive Case Against Hillary Clinton
President Donald Trump in New Jersey, on July 19, 2026. David Ramos/Getty Images
Zachary Stieber
Zachary Stieber
Senior Reporter
|Updated:
0:00

President Donald Trump is going to ask the Supreme Court to consider overturning lower court verdicts against him in a case involving former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and others who created and promoted a debunked dossier accusing Trump of colluding with Russia, according to a new court filing.

Trump and his lawyers “will seek review of” the latest decision in the case, from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, according to the filing, dated July 23 and released to the public on July 28.
Trump brought the lawsuit in 2022 against Clinton, former British spy Christopher Steele, and more than two dozen other people, alleging they committed conspiracy crimes by creating the so-called Steele dossier and disseminating its claims ahead of the 2016 presidential election.

Steele, paid by Clinton’s campaign, compiled a dossier that included claims that the Russian government possessed a salacious video of Trump at a hotel in Moscow, based on what he claimed were sources inside Russia. His main source was later revealed to be Igor Danchenko, who was based in the United States and has been investigated by federal agents for possibly being a Russian spy.

A federal judge threw out the case from Trump later in 2022, determining that there were no specific facts supporting Trump’s allegations.
An Eleventh Circuit panel in 2025 upheld the ruling. The panel said Trump’s claims were “untimely and otherwise meritless,” and said he and his lawyers deserved sanctions.

A request for the full appeals court to rehear the case was denied in May.

Both the district and appeals courts committed legal errors, Trump’s lawyers said in the new filing.

That includes the determination that the allegations of conspiracy could not be brought because they were filed after the statute of limitations had expired and the conclusion that Trump being president did not count as an extraordinary factor that would pause the period of time for the statute of limitations.

“These matters are of fundamental importance to multiple constitutional and statutory interpretation issues,” the filing stated. “These questions warrant granting a writ of certiorari, and require substantial legal research and review by counsel, including as to circuit conflicts. The issues are complex.”

The lawyers requested an extension of the deadline they face to lodge a writ of certiorari, or a review of the lower court ruling. That extension is needed due to factors such as the complexity of the record for the case, which spans hundreds of filings, they said.

A lawyer representing Clinton declined to comment.

If the writ is eventually filed, then justices will vote on whether to grant the petition. At least four of the nine justices must vote to accept a writ for the court to consider an appeal.

Google LogoMark Us Preferred on Google
Zachary Stieber
Zachary Stieber
Senior Reporter
Zachary Stieber is a senior reporter for The Epoch Times based in Maryland. He covers U.S. and world news. Contact Zachary at [email protected]
twitter
truth