Trump: Military Annexation of Canada ‘Highly Unlikely,’ but Not Ruled Out for Greenland

President Donald Trump said military action in either case is unlikely, but said he is less certain about Greenland.

Residents take advantage of good weather in Nuuk, Greenland, on May 4, 2025. John Fredricks/The Epoch Times

President Donald Trump on May 4 ruled out using military force to annex Canada, but said he was not ruling the possibility out in the case of Greenland.

During an interview that aired May 4 on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” anchor Kristin Welker asked Trump whether he would rule out military force against Canada.

Trump said: “I think we’re not going to ever get to that point. Something could happen with Greenland. I’ll be honest, we need that for national and international security.”

Welker asked, “But not with Canada?”

Trump told her: “It’s highly unlikely. I just don’t see it with Canada, I have to be honest with you.”

Trump said action against Greenland was also unlikely, but noted that he could envision circumstances in which he would be open to it.

“I don’t rule it out,” he said. “I don’t say I’m going to do it, but I don’t rule out anything.

“We need Greenland very badly ... for international security,” he noted, promising that the United States would “cherish” the “very small amount of people” currently inhabiting the Arctic mega-island.

“We have Russian boats and we have Chinese boats, gun ships all over the place ... going up and down the coast of Greenland. We need that to be protected. Internationally, we need it.”

Canada

Following his election in November 2024, Trump stirred up the international community by expressing interest in reclaiming U.S. control over the Panama Canal, obtaining control of Greenland, and potentially absorbing Canada as the 51st state.

After the election, in meetings with then-Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Trump referred to Trudeau as “Governor ... of the Great State of Canada.”

During the interview, Trump maintained that he was serious about the proposal and believed that it would be to both countries’ benefit.

Asked whether he would discuss the prospect of adding Canada to the United States with newly elected Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, Trump said: “I'll always talk about that. If Canada was a state it wouldn’t cost us. It would be great.”

Speaking about a hypothetical map after a U.S.–Canada merger, Trump said: “I’m a real estate guy at heart. When I look down at that [map] without that artificial line that was drawn with a ruler many years ago. ... What a beautiful country it would be.”

The United States, meanwhile, would benefit because Canada would no longer be reliant on it for defense spending while existing as a separate country.

“Canada [spends] less money on military than practically any nation in the world,” Trump said. “They pay NATO less than any nation. They think we are subsidizing, they think we are going to protect them—and really, we are—but the truth is, they don’t carry their full share, and it’s unfair to the United States and our taxpayers.”

As of 2024, Canada was one of the eight NATO member nations that did not meet the minimum defense expenditure of 2 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP). With defense expenditure at 1.37 percent of its GDP, Canada was ranked 27th out of the 32 member nations in 2024 on defense spending. Prime Minister Carney has said Canada will meet its 2 percent spending requirement by 2030.

Greenland

Much more of Trump’s geopolitical attention in the Western Hemisphere has focused on Greenland.

Trump has long had ambitions to add Greenland as a U.S. territory, first floating the idea of purchasing it from Denmark, which currently controls it, in 2019 during his first term.

There are several reasons for his interest in the sparsely populated Arctic island.

U.S. control of Greenland has been a central focus of Trump’s foreign policy, which has been compared to the Monroe Doctrine in its emphasis on increasing U.S. influence on Western Hemisphere geopolitics.

Russia’s northern coastline circles the Arctic, and the adversary has long taken an interest in the region.

In December 2024, an article from the Department of Defense reported that Chinese interest in the region was also increasing, and that greater funding would be required to protect U.S. interests in the Arctic.

Since October, the two leading U.S. rivals have been conducting joint patrols in the region, an escalation from the Chinese regime’s previously minimal involvement with Arctic affairs.

During a March tour of Greenland, including a visit to the U.S. Pituffik Space Base on the northern tip of the island, U.S. Vice President JD Vance said the administration is “really interested in Arctic security” and predicted that the issue will increase in relevance in the coming years.

Vance said Denmark, which currently rules Greenland, has not “devoted the resources necessary to keep this base, to keep our troops, and ... to keep the people of Greenland safe from a lot of very aggressive incursions from Russia, from China, and other nations [in the region].”

Aside from that, Pituffik Space Base is crucial to the United States’ missile defense strategy, as the Arctic represents the shortest distance an intercontinental ballistic missile would need to fly to strike the U.S. mainland.

Rare earth elements, such as lithium and titanium, are abundant on the island—including 31 critical minerals of the roughly 50 identified by the Department of Energy. Several of these minerals are crucial for manufacturing the microchips that power almost all modern technology.

China currently dominates the international market for several of these elements, making the United States heavily reliant on its leading adversary in this domain.

The area also neighbors several crucial shipping and strategic channels in the Arctic, increasing its potential value to the United States.