Former president Donald Trump, the current GOP frontrunner for the 2024 presidential race, has opposed the new trial schedule, to start on Oct. 23, proposed by prosecution in his Fulton County case.
The two-month deadline proposal to try all 19 defendants together came in response to defendant Kenneth Chesebro filing a motion demanding a “speedy trial” on Wednesday.
Managing the schedules of 19 different defendants was a concern legal experts had raised when the indictment was first handed up on Aug. 14, and Ms. Willis said in a press conference afterwards that she would go to trial within six months.
Attorney Steven Sadow, who joined President Trump’s legal team just Thursday, wrote a response to the district attorney’s motion to oppose the schedule.
“President Trump also alerts the Court that he will be filing a timely motion to sever his case from that of co-defendant Chesebro, who has filed a demand for speedy trial, or any other co-defendant who files such a demand,” he wrote.
Other defendants are expected to do the same, and sever their cases.
Mr. Chesebro’s attorney, Scott Grubman, indicated the October trial would not be a problem.
“Mr. Chesebro will be prepared to move forward with trial for whatever date the Court ultimately sets,” he told The Epoch Times, before Judge Scott McAfee ordered a Nov. 3 trial date for Mr. Chesebro.
“The scheduling will occur on an expedited timeline to meet the November 3, 2023 deadline to begin trial,” he wrote, adding a Sept. 6 arraignment, Sept. 20 discovery deadline, and Sept. 27 motions deadline. A pretrial conference for Mr. Chesebro will be held Sept. 29.
Schedules
President Trump, on the other hand, is facing several court proceedings as he continues to campaign for 2024 reelection.Court proceedings in Florida have been ongoing in a federal case brought against him by special counsel Jack Smith over allegedly mishandling classified documents.
Mr. Smith has brought another case against him, in Washington, over contesting the 2020 election results, similar to Ms. Willis’s Fulton County case but in federal court.
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg also has a case against him over allegedly mishandling business finances, and all three of these cases could potentially go to trial in 2024, as the presidential election heats up.
Thursday Surrender
President Trump’s expected, high profile surrender on Thursday was preceded by a gathering of supporters outside the Fulton County jail that began early in the morning.
The dozen or so enthusiastic rallygoers at 7 a.m. grew to hundreds a few hours later. The former president wrote on Truth Social in the afternoon that he was getting ready to head to Georgia and would arrive for his surrender by 7:30 p.m., simultaneously plugging the interview he did with Tucker Carlson, which aired the same time as the GOP debates on Wednesday.
“231,000,000 Views, and still counting. The Biggest Video on Social Media, EVER, more than double the Super Bowl!” he wrote. “But please excuse me, I have to start getting ready to head down to Atlanta, Georgia, where Murder and other Violent Crimes have reached levels never seen before, to get ARRESTED by a Radical Left, Lowlife District Attorney, Fani Willis, for A PERFECT PHONE CALL, and having the audacity to challenge a RIGGED & STOLEN ELECTION. THE EVIDENCE IS IRREFUTABLE! ARREST TIME: 7:30 P.M.”
By Thursday afternoon, the majority of the 19 defendants had already surrendered, had their fingerprints and mugshots taken, and gotten released on bond.
President Trump’s bond was set at $200,000, the highest of all the defendants.
The arraignment may also be atypical; unlike the previous three, this one may be televised.
Following the request of four local television stations, Judge McAfee issued an order allowing the recording of video and audio in the courtroom between Aug. 23 and Sept. 8, the period Ms. Willis said she plans to hold arraignments.
The Georgia indictment charged President Trump with 13 counts, including violation of the state’s RICO act, conspiracy to commit forgery in the first degree, filing false documents, and solicitation of violation of oath by a public office, among others.
