The Epoch Times
The Epoch Times
AD
The Epoch Times
Support Us
SHARE
USFeatured TopicsConstitutional Rights

Supreme Court Will Not Review Ruling Limiting Pro-Life Counseling Outside Abortion Clinics

The Seventh Circuit ruled against those who challenged a bubble zone law in March 2024, finding precedent barred the appeal.
Copy
Facebook
X
Truth
Gettr
LinkedIn
Telegram
Email
Save
Supreme Court Will Not Review Ruling Limiting Pro-Life Counseling Outside Abortion Clinics
Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas poses for an official portrait at the East Conference Room of the Supreme Court building in Washington on Oct. 7, 2022. Alex Wong/Getty Images
Matthew Vadum
By Matthew Vadum
2/24/2025Updated: 2/25/2025
0:00

The Supreme Court decided on Feb. 24 not to hear a case challenging a 25-year-old precedent allowing governments to forbid outreach within a so-called bubble zone outside abortion clinics.

The nation’s highest court did not explain its new, unsigned order that denied the petition in Coalition Life v. City of Carbondale.

Justice Clarence Thomas dissented from the ruling. Justice Samuel Alito indicated that he would have granted the petition but did not explain why. Alito did not join Thomas’s dissenting opinion.

The case arose from a now-rescinded Carbondale, Illinois, law that forbade outreach within a certain distance of abortion clinics.

The local disorderly conduct ordinance being challenged made it illegal—within 100 feet of a hospital, medical clinic, or health care facility—to come within eight feet of another person with the intention of distributing leaflets, displaying signs, or participating in protest, education, or counseling.

The city enacted the ordinance months after the Supreme Court’s June 2022 ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.

Related Stories
Supreme Court Allows Whistleblower Suit Against Wisconsin Bell
2/23/2025
Supreme Court Allows Whistleblower Suit Against Wisconsin Bell
Supreme Court Blocks Lawsuit Against Hungary for Seizing Assets During the Holocaust
2/22/2025
Supreme Court Blocks Lawsuit Against Hungary for Seizing Assets During the Holocaust

Dobbs overturned Roe v. Wade (1973), holding that there was no right to an abortion under the U.S. Constitution. It returned the regulation of abortion to the states.

The local law came into force in January 2023, but the city repealed it later that year.

In their petition, challengers had also asked the justices to review the Supreme Court’s ruling in Hill v. Colorado (2000) that upheld a Colorado law prohibiting activists opposed to abortion from coming within eight feet of another person inside a 100-foot zone around a health care facility without that person’s consent.

The Supreme Court ruled at that time that activists were still free to express their opinions outside the designated zone.

Coalition Life, a pro-life sidewalk counseling organization, argued in its petition docketed in July 2024 that the 2023 law violated sidewalk counselors’ First Amendment right to approach women near abortion facilities to advise them of alternatives to abortion.

The group, which is active in sidewalk counseling outside abortion clinics in Kansas, Missouri, and Illinois, sued Carbondale, arguing that the local law was unconstitutional.

Pro-life groups argue that laws restricting free speech outside abortion clinics deserve to be reexamined in light of the Dobbs ruling.

In July 2023, U.S. District Judge Stephen McGlynn of the Southern District of Illinois dismissed the lawsuit against Carbondale’s bubble zone law in a brief two-page ruling.

The judge held that the lawsuit was barred by Hill v. Colorado.

In March 2024, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit dismissed Coalition Life’s appeal of McGlynn’s decision. In its three-page order, the circuit court found that the group’s arguments were “foreclosed” by Hill v. Colorado.

In his dissent, Thomas said the Supreme Court long ago “stopped applying Hill.”

“Hill has been seriously undermined, if not completely eroded, and our refusal to provide clarity is an abdication of our judicial duty,” the justice wrote.

Thomas wrote that several justices have described the Hill precedent as a deviation from the Supreme Court’s First Amendment rulings, calling it “absurd,” “defunct,” “erroneous,” and “long-discredited.”

“I would have taken this opportunity to explicitly overrule Hill,” Thomas wrote.

“For now, we leave lower courts to sort out what, if anything, is left of Hill’s reasoning, all while constitutional rights hang in the balance.”

Peter Breen, executive vice president and head of litigation at the Thomas More Society, a public interest law firm on Coalition Life’s legal team, expressed disappointment.

“On the eve of our petition deadline, Carbondale quietly repealed its bubble zone ordinance ... knowing full well their bubble zone would fail constitutional scrutiny if it came before the Supreme Court,” he told The Epoch Times.

The city “flagrantly violated ... free speech rights for 18 months without penalty,” he said.

“This game of legal Whac-A-Mole is an unsustainable dynamic, and the only solution is for the court to overrule Hill once and for all.”

Brian Westbrook, founder and executive director of Coalition Life, told The Epoch Times that even though the appeal was declined, across the country the right of sidewalk counselors “to inform women about their options” continues to be denied.

Jamie Snyder, city attorney for Carbondale, did not respond to a request for comment.

The city had argued in an Oct. 3, 2024, brief that there was no need for the Supreme Court to accept the case because Hill was correctly decided and the city had repealed the ordinance, which made the appeal moot, or legally irrelevant.
Matthew Vadum
Matthew Vadum
contributor
Matthew Vadum is an award-winning investigative journalist.
Author’s Selected Articles

Supreme Court Temporarily Shields DOGE From Freedom of Information Requests

May 23, 2025
Supreme Court Temporarily Shields DOGE From Freedom of Information Requests

Supreme Court Allows Trump Admin to Remove Labor Board Members for Now

May 22, 2025
Supreme Court Allows Trump Admin to Remove Labor Board Members for Now

Supreme Court Deadlocks, Leaves in Place Block on Nation’s First Religious Charter School

May 22, 2025
Supreme Court Deadlocks, Leaves in Place Block on Nation’s First Religious Charter School

Supreme Court Won’t Hear Fireworks Company’s Dispute With Consumer Product Regulator

May 22, 2025
Supreme Court Won’t Hear Fireworks Company’s Dispute With Consumer Product Regulator
Save
The Epoch Times
Copyright © 2000 - 2025 The Epoch Times Association Inc. All Rights Reserved.