Supreme Court Rules 9–0 That Lower Court Should Have Put Delivery Drivers’ Lawsuit on Hold

By dismissing the lawsuit, the appeals court ignored the requirements of the Federal Arbitration Act, the justices ruled.
Supreme Court Rules 9–0 That Lower Court Should Have Put Delivery Drivers’ Lawsuit on Hold
Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor poses for an official photo at the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington on Nov. 30, 2018. Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images
Matthew Vadum
Updated:
0:00

The Supreme Court ruled unanimously on May 16 that if a federal court determines that a lawsuit involves an arbitrable dispute and a litigant requests a stay of the proceeding pending arbitration, a federal arbitration law requires the court to grant the stay.

Companies often prefer arbitration to the courts, saying the process resolves cases with greater speed and reduced expense. Some consumer advocates prefer the courts because, in their view, the judicial system provides private citizens and consumers with more options and is less likely to side with the companies being sued.