Supreme Court Won't Hear COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Challenge From NYC Teachers

Supreme Court Won't Hear COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Challenge From NYC Teachers
Members of the Supreme Court pose for a group photograph at the Supreme Court in Washington on April 23, 2021. Seated from left: Associate Justice Samuel Alito, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Associate Justice Stephen Breyer, and Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor. Standing from left: Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch, and Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett. (Erin Schaff/Pool/Getty Images)
Jack Phillips

The U.S. Supreme Court refused on April 18 to hear a New York City vaccine mandate challenge from teachers, meaning the mandate will be allowed to stand.

The nation's high court rejected the case (pdf) without comment and provided no indication that any of the justices would take it.

The four teachers, who said the COVID-19-related rule violated their right to keep their profession, took their appeal to the Supreme Court after a lower court left the city's mandate in place. Those teachers previously asked Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who oversees the state, to provide relief that would block the mandate from taking effect, which Sotomayor rejected.

Under the mandate, all city Department of Education employees who didn't comply with getting the vaccine by Oct. 1, 2021, would be suspended without pay for up to one year. But the teachers argued that the rule violated their due process rights and blocked them from practicing their profession because the city's Department of Education is the only agency in the city that publicly hires teachers.

Vinoo P. Varghese, who represented the teachers, told Forbes on April 18 that the teachers “are disappointed in the result, but we will continue the fight to protect the due process rights of our teachers against the new administration of Mayor Eric Adams.”

In February, New York City fired more than 1,400 employees who remained unvaccinated. The policy allows for religious and medical exemptions.

“This case presents the Court with the opportunity to address a critical constitutional issue—whether public-school teachers have a fundamental right to practice their profession,” the teachers wrote (pdf) in their petition to the Supreme Court. "Furthermore, the Court can provide needed guidance to the lower courts regarding the flood of COVID-19 vaccine mandate-related cases already pending and expected."

In response, however, New York City attorneys argued that the petitioners "made no attempt to explain how the vaccination requirement either prevented—or even impaired—their ability to work as teachers or paraprofessionals for another employer."

Vaccine mandates for public-sector and private-sector employees were announced in late 2021 under former Mayor Bill de Blasio's administration.

Last month, New York City’s health commissioner, Ashwin Vasan, said the vaccine mandate for private-sector workers who work on-site will continue indefinitely. The city's mask mandate for children 5 and under will also remain intact for the foreseeable future, Vasan said.

While the Supreme Court has previously blocked federal COVID-19 vaccine mandates, including a controversial Biden administration rule requiring tens of millions of private employees at many companies to receive shots, the justices have often permitted COVID-19 vaccine mandates at the local and state level.

The case is Maniscalco v. New York City Department of Education; 21-854.
Jack Phillips is a breaking news reporter with 15 years experience who started as a local New York City reporter. Having joined The Epoch Times' news team in 2009, Jack was born and raised near Modesto in California's Central Valley. Follow him on X:
Related Topics