Senate Parliamentarian Strikes Out Certain Provisions of Megabill

Senate Republicans could overrule MacDonough’s rulings, but Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) has said they will not do so.
Senate Parliamentarian Strikes Out Certain Provisions of Megabill
The U.S. Capitol building in Washington on May 22, 2025. Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times
|Updated:
0:00

Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough has ruled that certain provisions of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act are not germane to the process under which Republicans are trying to pass the measure, according to the Senate Budget Committee on June 19.

The GOP is seeking to pass the bill under the reconciliation process, which exempts the bill from the Senate’s 60-vote filibuster threshold that applies to most legislation.

Known as the Byrd Rule, reconciliation can only deal with spending, government revenue, and the national debt. Democrats have unanimously opposed the GOP-led bill.

The parliamentarian ruled that cutting the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s maximum funding cap to zero percent, thereby effectively defunding it, is out of order. The cap is currently $6.4 billion.

The Trump administration, advised by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has sought to shut down the bureau, which oversees financial institutions such as banks and credit card companies.

Republicans have criticized it for not being subject to congressional oversight and for getting its funding through the Federal Reserve, as opposed to directly from Congress.

The parliamentarian also said that cutting the pay of Federal Reserve staff by $1.4 billion is not germane to reconciliation rules.

Cuts to the Financial Research Fund and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board were also ruled as being out of order.

They amounted to $293 million and $771 million in cuts, respectively. The latter would have been eliminated under that provision.

Additionally, MacDonough ruled that undoing funding and statutory authorizations under the Inflation Reduction Act could not be done through reconciliation.

Moreover, the parliamentarian said that a provision reducing appropriations to the Department of Defense if it does not send budget proposals on time goes against the Byrd Rule, which was named for former Sen. Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.).

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has been criticized for sending what lawmakers called a rough and skinny budget for the Pentagon ahead of Congress debating appropriations bills.

“A reconciliation bill, which is a budget bill that passes with 50 votes, is limited by Senate rules to ’mandatory' spending only—[for example] Medicaid and Food Stamps,” White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy Stephen Miller wrote in a post on X.

“The Senate rules prevent it from cutting ‘discretionary’ spending—[for example] the Department of Education or federal grants. The DOGE cuts are overwhelmingly discretionary, not mandatory.”

Senate Budget Committee Ranking Member Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) celebrated the parliamentarian’s rulings.

“Tonight, the Senate Parliamentarian advised that certain provisions in the Republicans’ One Big, Beautiful Betrayal will be subject to the Byrd Rule—ultimately meaning they will need to be stripped from the bill to ensure it complies with the rules of reconciliation,” he said in a statement on Thursday.

“As much as Senate Republicans would prefer to throw out the rule book and advance their families-lose-and-billionaires-win agenda, there are rules that must be followed, and Democrats are making sure those rules are enforced.

“We will continue examining every provision in this Great Betrayal of a bill and will scrutinize it to the furthest extent.”

In what is known as a “Byrd Bath,” MacDonough will continue to hear from Republicans and Democrats on why certain provisions should or should not be allowed in the reconciliation bill.

Senate Republicans could overrule MacDonough’s rulings, but Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) has said they will not do so.

“We’re not going there,” he told reporters this month.

Google LogoMark Us Preferred on Google
Jackson Richman
Jackson Richman
Reporter
Jackson Richman is a Washington correspondent for The Epoch Times. In addition to Washington politics, he covers the intersection of politics and sports/sports and culture. He previously was a writer at Mediaite and Washington correspondent at Jewish News Syndicate. His writing has also appeared in The Washington Examiner. He is an alum of George Washington University.
twitter