Powell Defends $2.5 Billion Fed Headquarters Renovation in Response to Trump Admin

Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought alleged that Powell may have broken the law by not complying with government oversight regulations.
Powell Defends $2.5 Billion Fed Headquarters Renovation in Response to Trump Admin
Fed Chair Jerome Powell testifies before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs on Capitol Hill in Washington on June 25, 2025. Kent Nishimura/Getty Images
|Updated:

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell responded in a July 17 letter to a senior Trump administration official who last week accused the leader of the nation’s central bank of mismanaging its $2.5 billion Washington headquarters renovation project.

On July 10, Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Russell Vought penned a letter to Powell and posted it to X, criticizing the Fed chair for overseeing what he called an “ostentatious overhaul” of the Federal Reserve’s Washington headquarters, which includes the historic marble Marriner S. Eccles Building on the National Mall.

He suggested that Powell may have broken the law by not complying with government oversight regulations related to the facility’s ongoing $2.5 billion renovation.

“The President is extremely troubled by your management of the Federal Reserve System,” Vought wrote. “Instead of attempting to right the Fed’s fiscal ship, you have plowed ahead with an ostentatious overhaul of your Washington D.C. headquarters.”

The OMB director gave Powell seven business days to respond to the letter and said construction could be halted immediately.

Vought alleged that the renovation plans for the 90-year-old Marriner S. Eccles Building include terrace rooftop gardens, water features, VIP elevators, and premium marble. He also suggested that Powell’s June 25 testimony raises “serious questions” about the project’s compliance with the National Capital Planning Act, if the current renovation plans include elements not approved by the National Capital Planning Commission.

The National Capital Planning Act requires construction projects for the federal government to be approved by the National Capital Planning Commission.

This week, the Federal Reserve updated its frequently asked questions page to respond to Vought’s allegations.

“Major systems in both buildings were obsolete and in need of replacement for health and safety reasons,” the website states. “They included plumbing, electrical, fire suppression, water connections, and HVAC. Some systems dated to the construction of the buildings in the 1930s.”

The central bank also denied that the plans include new water features, VIP elevators, and terrace rooftop gardens.

Powell went a step further on Thursday, responding point by point to Vought in his letter to the OMB director.

He said the project and its financing have always received careful oversight from the Federal Reserve’s board and its independent inspector general. Powell said the Fed is “not generally subject to the direction” of the National Capital Planning Commission, but that it “voluntarily collaborated” with the commission in the “earlier stages of the project.”

“We have taken great care to ensure the project is carefully overseen since it was first approved by the Board in 2017,” Powell wrote.

Powell added that upgrades that were included in the official planning documents approved by the commission in 2021 were later removed, but said the Fed did not have to submit new paperwork because the changes weren’t “substantial.”

He said the changes were instead “intended to simplify construction and reduce the likelihood of further delays and cost increases.”

“The Board does not regard any of these changes as warranting further review,” Powell wrote.

The Fed chair said both buildings needed “significant structural repairs and other updates to make the buildings safe, healthy, and effective places to work.”

These updates included “the removal of asbestos and lead contamination, complete replacement of antiquated systems such as electrical, plumbing, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning, as well as fire detection and suppression systems.”

Trump, Powell Diverge on Interest Rates

There have been weeks of back and forth between the White House and the Fed chair, with President Donald Trump routinely criticizing Powell for not lowering interest rates.

Powell has said the lack of certainty over tariff-driven inflation has made the Fed delay lowering interest rates for now, since price impacts are expected to manifest weeks or months after tariffs settle into the markets.

The president wants lower interest rates to make borrowing less expensive, which juices the economy, and since interest payments on the national debt have exceeded $900 billion. This has led to uncertainty over whether Trump may make the unprecedented decision to fire Powell before his term ends next May.

Trump said on Wednesday that he was unlikely to fire Powell “unless he has to leave for fraud.”

The Trump administration has not outright accused Powell of fraud for his management of the renovation project.

However, Trump, Vought, and National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett have discussed the construction endeavor when criticizing Powell.

During a July 13 interview with ABC News, Hassett was asked about Vought’s criticism of the renovation project and whether it was grounds for Trump to fire Powell.

“This is the most expensive project in D.C. history, $2.5 billion with a $700 million cost overrun,” Hassett said. “To put that in perspective, the cost overrun for this Federal Reserve project is about the same size as the second biggest building overhaul in American history, which was the FBI building. And so, the Fed has a lot to answer for.”

Katabella Roberts and Naveen Athrappully contributed to this report.
Google LogoMark Us Preferred on Google
Jacob Burg
Jacob Burg
Author
Jacob Burg reports on national politics, aerospace, and aviation for The Epoch Times. He previously covered sports, regional politics, and breaking news for the Sarasota Herald Tribune.